Cite this article as:

Tatarko A. N. Attitudes Towards Money and Social Capital. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2012, vol. 12, iss. 3, pp. 95-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2012-12-3-95-99

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
Psychology
UDC: 
159.9316.6
Language: 
Russian

Attitudes Towards Money and Social Capital

The correlation between social capital and relationships to money was discussed. We suggested that social capital may perform a regulatory function in the people’s relation to material resources, which may occur at the individual level in relation to money. It was found that social capital at the individual level, demonstrates a negative effect on the following groups of monetary attitudes: «retention», «power» «inadequacy», «security».

Author: 
Tatarko
A.
N.
,
National Research University "Higher School of Economics", Moscow.
,
Myasnitskaya Street, 20. Russia, Moscow.
,
tatarko@yandex.ru
Key words: 
social capital, monetary attitudes, civil identity, trust
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2012-12-3-95-99
Literature
  1. Healy T., Cote S., John H., Field S. The Well-Being of Nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital. P., 2001. Р. 148.
  2. Kilkenny M., Nalbarte L., Besser T. Reciprocated community support and small town - small business success // Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1999. Vol. 11, № 3. P. 231-246.
  3. Woolcock M. Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework // Theory and Society. 1998. Vol. 27, № 2. P. 151-208. 
  4. Handbook of social capital. The Troika of Sociology, Political Science and Economics / eds. G. T. Svendsen, G. L. H. Svenddsen. Cheltenham, 2010.
  5. Putnam R. Social capital measurement and consequences // Canadian J. of Policy Research. 2001. Vol. 2, № 1. P. 41-51.
  6. Coleman J. S. Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard; Cambridge, 1990.
  7. Putnam R., Leonardi R., Nanett R. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, 1993.
  8. Tajfel H. Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge; P., 1982.
  9. Taylor D. The Quest for Identity. From minority groups to Generation Xers. Westport, 2002.
  10. Perkins D., Hughey J., Speer P. Community psychology perspectives on social capital theory and community development practice // J. of the Community Development Society. 2002. Vol. 33, № 1. P. 33-52.
  11. Shockley-Zalabak P., Kathleen E., Gaynelle W. Organizational trust: What it means, why it matters // Organization Development J. 2000. Vol. 18, № 4. P. 35-48.
  12. Ssewamala F., Karimli L., Chang-Keun H. [et al.]. Social Capital, Savings and Educational Outcomes of Orphaned Adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa // Children and Youth Services Review. 2010. Vol. 32, № 12. P. 1704-1710.
  13. Barbieri P., Paugam S., Russel H. Social capital and unemployment exits // Regimes and the experience of unemployment in Europe / eds. D. Gallie, S. Paugam. Oxford, 2000. P. 200-217.
  14. Miller N. Contributions of social capital theory in predicting rural community inshopping behaviour // J. of Socio-Economics. 2001. Vol. 30, № 6. P. 475-493.
  15. Furnham A. Many sides of the coin: the psychology of money usage // Personality and Individual Differences. 1984. Vol. 5. P. 95-103.
  16. Furnham A., Lewis A. The Economic Mind: The social psychology of economic behaviour. L., 1986.
  17. Arbuckle J. IBM SPSS Amos 19 user's guide // Amos Development Corporation. 2010.
Status: 
одобрено к публикации
Full Text (PDF): 
3-2012_95-99_filosofiya_.pdf

Generator XML for DOAJ