Cite this article as:

Zakharova L. N. Creativity and innovativeness of the subject of labor in the new socio-economic conditions. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2023, vol. 23, iss. 3, pp. 308-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2023-23-3-308-312

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).

Heading:

Psychology

UDC:

37.013.41

Language:

Russian

Creativity and innovativeness of the subject of labor in the new socio-economic conditions

Introduction. The article analyzes the factors that create a demand for innovative development of the economy: the low level of innovativeness and labor productivity, the growth of bureaucracy in management. The demand of innovative economy for creative personnel is discussed. Theoretical analysis. It is shown that enterprises and organizations do not need so much creative as innovative personnel who may not participate in the creation of something new, but are busy implementing and adopting rapidly developing and fundamentally changing production and managerial technologies. Such personnel can work without distress in the organizational environment with the characteristics of instability, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity typical of the VUCA world. The use of theoretical modeling method allowed to develop a typology of personality with a combination of qualities of creativity and innovativeness: conservator, adaptor, creator of ideas and creative innovator, their characteristics are given. The key role of adaptors and creative innovators for enterprises of innovation economy is shown. The author considers the existing limits of personality formation with creative and innovative qualities. Conclusion. The characteristics of organizational culture that contributes to the development of personnel innovativeness were defined. The approaches to the improvement of corporate training, which removes the barriers of innovativeness are proposed.

Author:

Zakharova

Lyudmila

Nikolaevna

Nizhny Novgorod State University. NI Lobachevsky

603000, Nizhny Novgorod, ul. University, 7, Russia

zlnnnov@mail.ru

Key words:

VUCA world, personnel, innovation stress, typology, creativity, innovativeness

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2023-23-3-308-312

Literature

Johansen B., Euchner J. Navigating the VUCA world. Research-Technology Management, 2013, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 10–15. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5601003
Dutta S., Lanvin L.R. B., León L. R., Wunsch-Vincent S., eds. Global Innovation Index 2022. Cornell SC Johnson College of Business, 2022. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/2022/ (accessed 12 May 2023).
Pandey M. K., Shekhawat K. K., Sergeeva I., Orlova O. A nexus among technology input, research activity, innovation, and economic growth: A vis-àvis analysis between Asia and Europe. HSE Economic Journal, 2023, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 122–147. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2023-27-1-122-147
Fossen F., Sorgner A. Mapping the future of occupations: transformative and destructive effects of new digital technologies on jobs. Foresight and STI Governance, 2019, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 10–18. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2019.2.10.18
Volgin A. D., Gimpel’son V. E. Demand for Skills: Analysis Using Online Vacancy Data. Ekonomicheskij zhurnal VSHE [HSE Economic Journal], 2022, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 343–374. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2022-26-3-343-374 (in Russian).
Bogoyavlenskaya D. B. Psikhologiya tvorcheskikh sposobnostej [Psychology of Creative Abilities]. Moscow, Akademiya, 2002. 320 p. (in Russian).
Shumpeter J. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya: kapitalizm, socializm i demokratiya [Theory of Economic Development: Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2007. 864 р. (in Russian).
Yagolkovskiy S. R. Relationships among individuallevel correlates of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 2019, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-12-2017-0133
Fixsen D., Blase K., Metz A., van Dyke M. Implementation Science. In: Wright J. D., ed. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edition. Oxford, Elsevier, 2015, vol. 11, pp. 695–702.
Zakharova L. N., Leonova I. S. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskiy vozrast personala rossijskikh kompaniy [Socio-Psychological Age of Russian Companies’ Personnel]. Moscow, INFRA-M, 2021. 292 p. (in Russian).
Duchek S. Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 2020, no. 13, pp. 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7
Lee A., Legood A., Hughes D., Tian A. W., Newman A., Knigh C. Leadership, creativity and innovation: A meta-analytic review. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2020, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1661837

Journal issue:

Izv. Sarat. Univ. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2023, vol. 23, iss. 3,

Status:

одобрено к публикации

Full Text (PDF):

filosofiya_2023_3-308-312.pdf

Generator XML for DOAJ

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
 <record>
  <language>eng</language>
  <publisher>Saratov State University</publisher>
  <journalTitle>Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy</journalTitle>
  <issn>1819-7671</issn>
  <eissn>2542-1948</eissn>
  <publicationDate>2023-09-29</publicationDate> 
  <volume>23</volume>
  <issue>3</issue>
  <startPage>308</startPage>
  <endPage>312</endPage>
  <doi>10.18500/1819-7671-2023-23-3-308-312</doi>
  <documentType>article</documentType>
  <title language="eng">Creativity and innovativeness of the subject of labor in the new socio-economic conditions</title>
  <authors>
    <author>
      <name>Zakharova, Lyudmila Nikolaevna</name>
      <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
    </author>
  </authors>
  <affiliationsList>
    <affiliationName affiliationId="1">Nizhny Novgorod State University. NI Lobachevsky, 603000, Nizhny Novgorod, ul. University, 7, Russia</affiliationName>
    </affiliationsList>
  <abstract language="eng">Introduction. The article analyzes the factors that create a demand for innovative development of the economy: the low level of innovativeness and labor productivity, the growth of bureaucracy in management. The demand of innovative economy for creative personnel is discussed. Theoretical analysis. It is shown that enterprises and organizations do not need so much creative as innovative personnel who may not participate in the creation of something new, but are busy implementing and adopting rapidly developing and fundamentally changing production and managerial technologies. Such personnel can work without distress in the organizational environment with the characteristics of instability, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity typical of the VUCA world. The use of theoretical modeling method allowed to develop a typology of personality with a combination of qualities of creativity and innovativeness: conservator, adaptor, creator of ideas and creative innovator, their characteristics are given. The key role of adaptors and creative innovators for enterprises of innovation economy is shown. The author considers the existing limits of personality formation with creative and innovative qualities. Conclusion. The characteristics of organizational culture that contributes to the development of personnel innovativeness were defined. The approaches to the improvement of corporate training, which removes the barriers of innovativeness are proposed.
</abstract>
  <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://old-phpp.sgu.ru/sites/old-phpp.sgu.ru/files/2023/09/filosofiya_2023_3-308-312.pdf</fullTextUrl>
  <keywords language="eng">
    <keyword>VUCA world</keyword>
    <keyword>personnel</keyword>
    <keyword>innovation stress</keyword>
    <keyword>typology</keyword>
    <keyword>creativity</keyword>
    <keyword>innovativeness</keyword>
  </keywords>
 </record>
</records>