Cite this article as:
Frolova S. M., Listvina E. V. Culture in the Era of Digitalization: Social and Philosophical Understanding. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2019, vol. 19, iss. 4, pp. 408-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2019-19-4-408-412
Culture in the Era of Digitalization: Social and Philosophical Understanding
The article deals with the phenomenon of a digital society and a digital culture as a consequence of the penetration of digital technologies into the main components of the sphere of culture, influencing the formation of a new cultural experience and changing behavioral and cultural preferences. The article highlights the specific characteristics of a digital culture associated with qualitative changes in such social parameters as changing the perception of time, the emergence of new forms of communication, the development of a different style of behavior of individuals, changing forms of employment of individuals, and the formation of new institutional settings of everyday life. The authors note the ambiguity of the phenomenon under study, which, on the one hand, is actively implemented in all spheres of social life and becomes an inevitable condition for the existence of social institutions, socio-cultural communication, social forecasting and the planetary perspective on the whole. On the other hand, the authors raise the question – how much technical progress is needed, which turns against the person himself and leads to the elimination of jobs, the rejection of the analytical perception of information, to the loss of the ability of logical thinking, the replacement of live communication with the screen one. At the same time, the authors note the phenomena which have evolved in recent years: media asceticism (conscious restriction of access to media information and the use of gadgets), which is becoming the sign of a social elite; increasing archaization of regions around the world when using the latest technology for archaization processes. All this requires further attention and socio-philosophical analysis of the problems raised in the article.
1. Ivanov A. V. Digital Religion. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2018, vol. 18, iss. 4, pp. 377–381 (in Russian).
2. Kuznetsova T. F. Digital Culture. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill], 2018, no. 4, pp. 233–237 (in Russian).
3. Shamshurin D. A. Digital media as a factor of cultural globalization. Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatelskiy zhurnal [International Research Journal], 2018, no. 6 (72), part 2, pp. 70–75 (in Russian).
4. Galkin D. V. Digital Culture: Methodological Issues of Research of Cultural Dynamics from Digital Automatons to Techno-Bio-Creatures. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal issledovaniy kultury [International Journal of Cultural Studies], 2012, no. 3, pp. 11–16 (in Russian).
5. Sokolova N. L. Digital Culture or Culture in the Digital Age. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal issledovaniy kultury [International Journal of Cultural Studies], 2012, no. 3, pp. 7–10 (in Russian).
6. Toffl er A. Future Shock. New York, 1970. 286 p. (Russ. ed.: Toffl er A. Futuroshok. Moscow, AST, 2008. 560 p.).
7. Mironov V. V. Platon and Modern Cave Big-Data. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Confl ict Studies, 2019, vol. 35, iss. 1, pp. 4–24 (in Russian).
8. Platon. Fedr [Phaedrus]. In: Platon. Dialogi [Dialogues]. Book one. Moscow, EKSMO, 2008. 1360 p. (in Russian).
9. Pogudaeva M. Yu., Semenova-Slabkovich Ya. A. Features of Consumer Behavior in the Information Economy. Economic Journal, 2012, no. 4 (28), pp. 96–104 (in Russian).
10. Maximova O. A. “Digital” Generation: Lifestyle and Identity Construction in Virtual Space. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk state University, 2013, no. 22 (313), Philology, Art criticism, iss. 81, pp. 6–10 (in Russian).
11. Slezin V. Genotsid beloy rasy. Krizis Evropy. Kak spastisʹ, kak preuspetʹ [Genocide of the White Race. The Crisis of Europe. How to Escape, How to Succeed]. Moscow, AST ; St. Petersburg, AST-SPb, 2010. 285 p. (in Russian).
12. Penn M. J. Zalesne E. Kinney. Microtrends: The Small Forces Behind Tomorrow`s Big Changes. Hachette Book Group USA, 2007. 425 p. (Russ. ed.: Penn M. Dzh. Mikrodendentsii: Malenʹkie izmeneniya, privodyashchie k bolʹshim peremenam. Moscow, AST, 2009. 510 p. (in Russian).
13. Kasavin I. T., Shchavelev S. P. Analiz povsednevnosti [Analysis of Everyday Life]. Moscow, Kanon+, 2004. 432 p. (in Russian).
14. Chetverikova O. Kak tsifrovoy mir menyaet cheloveka [How the Digital World Changes a Person]. Available at: https://view-w.ru/2017/05/06/kak-cifrovoj-mir-menyaetcheloveka/ (accessed 13 February 2009) (in Russian).
15. Sizova I. L., Khusyainov T. M. Work and employment in the digital economy: the problems of the Russian labour market. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 2017, vol. 10, iss. 4, pp. 376–396 (in Russian).
16. Soloviev D., Belous P. Media Asceticism as a Phenomenon of Digital Culture. Filosofskie problemy informatsionnykh tekhnologiy i kiberprostranstva [Philosophical Problems of Information Technologies and Cyberspace], 2014, no. 2, vol. 8, pp. 77–92 (in Russian).
17. Abrakhmanov D. M., Buranchin A. M., Demichev I. V. Arkhaizatsiya regionov kak sotsialʹnayach problema [The Archaization of Regions as a Social Problem]. Ufa, Mir pechati, 2016. 405 p. (in Russian).
18. Prokudin D. E., Sokolov E. G. “Digital Culture” vs “Analog Culture”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University, Series 17. Philosophy. Confl ict Studies. Cultural Studies. Religious Studies, 2013, iss. 4, pp. 83–91 (in Russian).
Generator XML for DOAJ
Не определено в Выпуске поле Опубликована онлайн:publicationDate