Cite this article as:

Аникин Д. А. Structuralism and Poststructuralism in the Philosophy of History. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2007, vol. 7, iss. 2, pp. 3-?.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
Philosophy
Language: 
Russian

Structuralism and Poststructuralism in the Philosophy of History

With the structuralizes and poststructuralists philosophy of history found in particular in the history of mentalities, a break is made for the first time with centuries-old essentialist tradition. Within the poststructuralist view of history, the goal is no longer integration, synthesis, and totality, but it is those historical scraps which are the center of attention.

Author: 
Anikin
Daniil
Alexandrovich
,
Saratov State University
,
83, Astrakhanskaya str., Saratov, 410002, Russia
,
dandee@list.ru
Key words: 
Structuralism, Poststructuralism
Literature

1 Aristotle. Metaphysics. M .; L., 1934. P.31.
2 Ibid. P.32.
3 Saussure F. The course of general linguistics / / Saussure F. Works on linguistics. M., 1977. P.152.
4 Propp V.Ya. Morphology of a fairy tale. M., 1998. P.12-15.
5 Kosikov G.K. "Structure" and / or "text" (strategy of modern semiotics) // French semiotics: From structuralism to poststructuralism. M., 2000. C.7-8. 6 Levi-Strauss K. Language and relationship // Levi-Strauss K. Structural anthropology. M., 2001. P.40.
7 Kosikov G.K. "Structure" and / or "text" (strategies of modern semiotics). C.5.
8 Ibid. C.6.

Status: 
одобрено к публикации
Short Text (PDF): 
1.pdf
Full Text (PDF): 
1.pdf

Generator XML for DOAJ

Error!
Не определено в Выпуске поле Опубликована онлайн:publicationDate