Cite this article as:
Frolova S. M. Subjective Images of the Past, Present and Future of a Country as Predictors of Commitment to One’s Country. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2019, vol. 19, iss. 4, pp. 442-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2019-19-4-442-447
Subjective Images of the Past, Present and Future of a Country as Predictors of Commitment to One’s Country
The article describes the results of the empirical research into and theoretical analysis of image determination of commitment to one’s country. Topicality of the issue is increasing in the globally transforming world that is facing growing tendencies of international, territorial mobility of life and career strategies of modern society. In the conditions of obvious outer macrosocial determination of sovereign migration behavior, social psychology has to tackle the tasks of scientific study of inner personal predictors of commitment to one’s country. The article was aimed at analyzing the role of subjective images of the past, present and future of a country in building up commitment of an individual to his or her country. To achieve the goal, the empirical research was undertaken. The research involved 219 people (137 female and 82 male participants; age range = 18-32) who were all citizens of Russia, university students and employees of private and state organizations. The research was based on the principle of anonymous participation and relied on the author’s original questionnaire “Commitment to One’s Country”, designed image and association test “The Image of Russia and Foreign Countries” and A. M. Etkind’s test of color relations. The role of subjective images of the past, present and future of a country in building up commitment of an individual to his or her country was assessed with the method of multiple regression analysis carried out by SPSS 20 computer program. The research revealed that subjective beliefs, positively and meaningfully connoted, about the future of the country play the major role in complex determination of commitment of an individual to his or her country.
1. Frolova S. V. The Model of Individual Commitment Factors to Social Community. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2013, vol. 13, iss. 4, pp. 80–86 (in Russian).
2. Buchanan P. J. State of Emergency. The third world invasion and conquest of America Edge of destruction. New York, Thomas Dunne Books / St. Martin’s Press, 2006. 320 p. (Russ. ed.: B’yukenen P. Dzh. Na krayu gibeli. Moscow, AST Publ., 2008. 349 p.).
3. Toffl er A. The third wave. New York, Bantam Books, 1980. 544 p. (Russ. ed.: Toffl er E. Tret’ya volna. Moscow, AST Publ., 2010. 784 p.).
4. Nestic T. A. Global Identity in Conditions of Development of Modern Society. In: Psihologicheskie issledovaniya globalnyh processov: predposylki, tendencii, perspektivy [Psychological Studies of Global Processes: Prerequisites, Trends, Prospects]. Мoscow, Institut psihologii RAN, 2018, pp. 281–292 (in Russian).
5. Buchan N. R., Brewer M. B., Grimalda G., Wilson R. K., Fatas E., Foddy M. Global Social Identity and Global Cooperation. Psychological Science, 2011, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 821–828.
6. Vosylis R., Erentaite R., Crocetti El. Global Versus Domain-Specifi c Identity Processes: Which Domains are More Relevant for Emerging Adults? Emerging Adulthood, 2018, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 32–41.
7. Martsinkovskaya T. D. Socialization in Transitivity Era: Methodological Aspect. Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2016, no. 5, pp. 14–21 (in Russian).
8. Lovakov A. V., Lipatov S. A. Organizational Identifi cation and Commitment of Personnel: Similarity and Difference. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 2011, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 69–80 (in Russian).
9. Allen N. J., Meyer J. P. The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1990, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1–18.
10. Meyer J. P., Maltin E. R. Employee Commitment and Well-being: A Critical Review, Theoretical Framework and Research Agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2010, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 323−337.
11. Gostev A. A. Psikhologiia vtorichnogo obraza [Psychology of Secondary Image]. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN, 2007. 512 p. (in Russian).
12. Smirnov S. D. Psikhologiya obraza: problema aktivnosti psikhicheskogo otrazheniya [Psychology of Image: The Problem of Psychical Refl ection Activity]. Moscow, MGU, 1985. 231 p. (in Russian).
13. Rubinshteyn S. L. The Principle of the Creative Oneself Activity (To the Philosophical Foundations of Modern Pedagogy). Voprosy Psychologii, 1986, no. 4, pp. 101−109 (in Russian).
14. Brushlinskiy A. V. Psikhologiya sub’’ekta [Psychology of a Subject]. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN; St. Petersburg, Aletejya Publ., 2003. 272 p. (in Russian).
15. Abul’khanova K. A. Methodological Principle of a Subject: Study of Person’s Life Course]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2014, no. 2, pp. 5−18 (in Russian).
16. Frolova S. V. Social’no-kognitivnye osnovanija psihologicheskoj priverzhennosti svoej strane [Socio-Cognitive Grounds for Psychological Commitment to Own Country]. Moscow, Akademicheskij proekt, 2017. 153 p. (in Russian).
17. Shapar’ V. B., Shapar’ O. V. Prakticheskaya psikhologiya. Proektivnye metodiki [Practical Psychology. Projective Methods]. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 2006. 480 p. (in Russian).
18. Sobchik L. N. Metod tsvetovykh vyborov – modifi katsiya vos’mitsvetovogo testa Lyushera. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo [Color Choice Method – Modifi cation of the Eight-Color Luscher’s Test. Practical handbook]. St. Petersburg, Rech’ Publ., 2016. 128 p. (in Russian).
Generator XML for DOAJ
Не определено в Выпуске поле Опубликована онлайн:publicationDate