Cite this article as:
Kubrakova N. A. Technologies of Teaching Academic Writing in English (The Case Study of Personal Statement). Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2020, vol. 20, iss. 4, pp. 458-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2020-20-4-458-462
Technologies of Teaching Academic Writing in English (The Case Study of Personal Statement)
Introduction. Developing academic communication skills is one the priorities in English language learning and teaching at universities. The process involves a comprehensive study into various genres of academic discourse. Written genres are of utmost importance since the greater part of academic communication takes place in a written form. Objective. The paper is aimed at describing the algorithm of teaching how to write a personal statement in English. Results. The author puts forward the methods that take into account genre conventions of a personal statement and special approaches to creating academic written texts that were designed by the foreign practitioners and are now being actively used by the Russian school of academic writing. Each stage employs universal and specific educational technologies that improve efficiency of class and independent work on personal statements. Conclusion. The algorithm consists of a wide range of procedures that enhance learning of the major components of a personal statement that refer to various knowledge dimensions. This approach enables all the participants to learn academic writing more effectively and consciously.
1. Universalnye kompetentsii i indikatory ikh dostizheniya dlya napravleniy bakalavriata i magistratury (Universal Competencies and Indicators of Their Achievement for Bachelor and Master Students. Site). Available at: https://www.sgu.ru/structure/edudep/perehod-na-fgos-3 (accessed 15 December 2019) (in Russian).
2. Smirnova N. V. Fostering academic literacy and academic writing in university: From theory to practice. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia], 2015, no. 6, pp. 58–64 (in Russian).
3. Escudero L. M. Rethinking academic writing pedagogy for the European university. International Journal of English Studies, 2013, no. 13 (1), pp. 167‒170.
4. Kearns J., Turner B. An international discourse community, an internationalist perspective: Reading EATAW conference programs, 2001‒2011. Journal of Academic Writing, 2015, no. 5 (1), pp. 1‒16.
5. Bogolepova S. V. Teaching Academic Writing: Process and Product. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia], 2016, no. 1 (197), pp. 87‒94 (in Russian).
6. Sovremennye obrazovatelnye tehnologii: uchebnoe posobie [Modern Educational Technologies: instructional manual. Textbook. Ed. by N.V. Bordovskaya]. Moscow, KNORUS Publ., 2011. 432 p. (in Russian).
7. Bhatia V. J. Applied Genre Analysis and ESP. In: T. Miller, ed. Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. Washington, DC: United States Information Agency, 1997, pp. 134‒150.
8. Dudley-Evans T. Genre Models for the Teaching of Academic Writing to Second Language Speakers: Advantages and Disadvantages. In: T. Miller, ed. Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. Washington, DC: United States Information Agency, 1997, pp. 150‒160.
9. Kubrakova N. A. Personal Statement as a Genre of Academic Discourse in English. Zhanry rechi [Speech Genres], 2019, no. 2 (22), pp. 119‒125 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2019-2-22-119-125
10. L. W. Anderson, D. R. Krathwohl et al., eds. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, Longman Inc., 2001. 302 p.
Generator XML for DOAJ
Не определено в Выпуске поле Опубликована онлайн:publicationDate