Cite this article as:

Pavlova D. A. The figure of Aristotle in the domestic intellectual atmosphere of the 19th century. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 1, pp. 40-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2022-22-1-40-44


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
UDC: 
1(470+571)(09)+929Аристотель
Language: 
Russian

The figure of Aristotle in the domestic intellectual atmosphere of the 19th century

A researcher dealing with the topic of the presence of Aristotle’s philosophy in the modern Russian space of the humanities is faced with the task of comprehending the origins of the attitude towards Aristotle in the history of Russian science. Aristotle in Russia, unlike Europe, is represented in a rather limited way, and even where he is present, modern Russian philosophy uses a rather narrow layer of thought from his heritage. The article is devoted to the theme of a special attitude to the fi gure of Aristotle in the fi eld of domestic social and humanitarian thought of the XIX century. During the formation of Russian philosophy as an independent phenomenon of global culture, Aristotle also falls into the fi eld of view of its founders. The interest in Aristotle was not originally of a scientifi c (historical-philosophical or philological) nature, but stemmed from current socio-political disputes, which would later become known as the disputes between Slavophiles and Westernizers. Aristotle in this case acts as a part of world culture, in which domestic intellectuals of the 19th century claim to a special place. This era is considered as a period that laid the basic principles of attitude towards Aristotle in Russia in the 20th century. Such principles are the attitude towards Aristotle as a historian of science and as a part of world culture.

Literature
  1. Averintsev S. S. Christian Aristotelianism as an internal form of the Western tradition and the problems of modern Russia. In: Averintsev S. S. Ritorika i istoki evropeyskoy literaturnoy traditsii [Rhetoric and Origins of the European Literary Tradition]. Moscow, Shkola “Yazyki russkoy kul’tury” Publ., 1996, pp. 319–328 (in Russian).
  2. Zubov V. P. Back to histoty Aristotelian tradition in Russia. In: Zubov V. P. Aristotel’ [Aristotle]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1963, pp. 332–349 (in Russian).
  3. Bibikhin V. V. Brief information about the life and thought of St. Gregory Palamas. In: Svyatitel’ Grigoriy Palama. Triady v zashchitu svyashchenno-bezmolvstvuyushchikh [Triads for the Defense of Those Who Practice Sacred Quietude]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2004, pp. 388–427 (in Russian).
  4. Damaskin Ioann. Istochnik znaniya [Fountain of Knowledge]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2006. 360 p. (in Russian).
  5. Dillon J. The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy (347–274 B.C.). Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2003. 252 p. (Russ. ed.: Dillon Dzh. Nasledniki Platona: issledovanie istorii Drevney Akademii (347–274 gg. do n. e.). St. Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo St. Peterburgskogo universiteta, 2005. 281 p.).
  6. Zen’kovskiy V. V. Istoriya russkoy fi losofi i [History of Russian Philosophy]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy Proekt Publ., Raritet Publ., 2001. 880 p. (in Russian).
  7. Schelling F. W. J. System of transcendental idealism. Charlottesville, University Press of Virginia, 1978. 248 p. (Russ. ed.: Shelling F. V. J. Sistema transtsendental’nogo idealizma. Leningrad, Sotsekgiz Publ., 1936. 479 p.).
  8. Chizhevskiy D. I. Gegel’ v Rossii [Hegel in Russia]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2007. 411 p. (in Russian).
  9. Marks K., Engel’s F. Soch. 2-e izd. T. 23 [The Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 23]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury, 1960. 900 p. (in Russian).
  10. Kolesnikov I. D. Fridrikh Nitsshe i antichnost’. Obraz klassicheskoy drevnosti v nemetskoy gumanitarnoy mysli XVIII–XX vekov [Friedrich Nietzsche and Antiquity. The Image of Classical Antiquity in the German Humanitarian Thought of the XVIII–XX Centuries]. Moscow, Kul’turnaya revolyutsiya Publ., 2020. 432 p. (in Russian).
Status: 
не проверено
Full Text (PDF): 

Generator XML for DOAJ