Cite this article as:

Tetyuev L. I. The Ontological Variants of Transcendental Philosophy Transformation. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2015, vol. 15, iss. 3, pp. 44-?. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2015-15-3-44-50


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 

The Ontological Variants of Transcendental Philosophy Transformation

The following article analyses contemporary projects of transcendental
philosophy which are based on ontological programmes. The
interest for ontology is motivated by comprehension tasks of «the last
foundation» and by the criticism of post-metaphysical thought. The
ideas of Munich School of Transcendental philosophy which issues
are limited by «Selbstbewusstsein» paradigm oriented on theological
and phenomenological studies are considered in the article. The study
revealed the dual model of «eventful ontology» which expands on the
nature area and «first person ontology». The contemporary subjective
ontology is based on interpersonal study as a certain ideal-real reality
and is represented as a source of post-Hegelian, post-rational mindset
distanced from the metaphysical issues.

Literature

1. Belov V. N. S. N. Trubetskoy i nemetskoe neokantianstvo:
problema idealizma (S. N. Trubezkoy and the german
neo-kantianism: The problem of idealism). Vestn. Mosk.
un-ta. Ser. 7. Philosofi ya (Moscow University Bulletin.
Ser. 7. Philosophy), 2014, vol. 2, pp. 3–14.
2. Tetyuev L. I. Yazyk, intersubektivnost, refleksiya:
osobennosti «lingvisticheskoy paradigm» K. -O. Apelya
(Language, шntersubjectivity, refl ection: peculiarities of
K.-O. Apel's «linguistic зaradigm»). Izv. Saratov Univ.
(N.S.), Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy. 2014,
vol. 14, iss. 2, pp. 49–52.
3. Habermas J. Wege der Detranszendentalisierung. Von
Kant zu Hegel und zurück (The move towards detranscendentalization.
From Kant to Hegel and back again).
Habermas J. Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung. Philosophische
Aufsätze (Truth and Justifi cation. Philosophical
Essays). Frankfurt/M., 2004, pp. 186–229.
4. Winter St. Heideggers Bestimmung der Metaphysik (Heidegger‘
s defi nition of metaphysics). Freiburg; München,
1993. 261 p.
5. Heidegger M. Sein und Zeit (Being and time). Tübingen,
2006. 445 p.
6. Gaidenko P. P. Proryv k transtsendentnomu: novaya
ontologiya XX veka (The breakthrough to the transcendental:
The new ontology of the XX century). Moscow,
1997. 495 p.
7. Cramer K. Metaphysik und Erfahrung in Kants Grundlegung
der Ethik (Metaphysics and experience in Kant’s
groundwork of a metaphysic of ethics). Kant in der
Diskussion der Moderne (Kant in modern debate).
Frankfurt/M., 1996, pp. 280–325.
8. Kant in der Diskussion der Moderne (Kant in modern
debate). Frankfurt/M, 1996. 590 p.
9. Lauth R. Transtsendentalnaya pozitsiya Myunkhenskoy
shkoly (The transcendental position of the Munich
school). Referativnyy zhurnal. Obshchestvennye nauki
za rubezhom. Ser. 3. Philosophy (Referenced journal.
Social sciences abroad. Ser. 3. Philosophy). Moscow,
1992, vol. 5, pp. 25–44.
10. Bader F. Fichtes Philosophie als Fortführung Kants und
als Rückkehr zu Augustinus (Fichte’s philosophy as a continuation
of Kant’s and as a return to Augustine). Natur,
Freiheit und Gnade im Spannungsfeld von Augustinus und
Kant (Nature, freedom and grace in the context of Augustine
and Kant). Eichstätt; Ingolstadt, 2010. Available
at: www. ku-eichstaett.de/Fakultaeten/THF/philosophie/
aktuelles.de (accessed 12 December 2014).
11. Wundt M. Die deutsche Schulphilosophie im Zeitalter
der Aufklärung (The german academic philosophy of
the enlightenment). Hildesheim, 1964. 346 p.
12. Dlugach T. B. I. Kant: ot rannikh proizvedeniy k «Kritike
chistogo razuma» (I. Kant: From уarly works to the
«Critique of pure reason»). Moscow, 1990. 130 p.
13. Laut R. K voprosu o genezise «Legendy o Velikom
Inkvizitore» (On the question of the genesis of «Legend
of the Grand Inquisitor»). Voprosy Filosofi i (Voprosy
Filosofi i), 1990, vol. 1, pp. 70–76.
14. Lauth R. «Ich habe die Wahrheit gesehen»: Die Philosophie
Dostojewskis. In systematischer Darstellung.
München, 1950. 408 S. (Russ. ed.: Lauth R. Filosofi ya
Dostoevskogo v sistematicheskom izlozhenii. Moscow,
1996. 447 p.).
15. Lauth R. Descartes’ Konzeption des Systems der Philosophie
(Descartes’ сonception of the philosophy system).
Stuttgart. Bad Cannstatt, 1998. 227 p.

16. Gromyko N. Myunkhenskaya shkola transtsendentalnoy
filosofii: metodologicheskiy aspekt (Munich
school of transcendental philosophy: Methodological
aspects). Kentavr (Centaur), 1995, vol. 1,
pp. 33–34.
17. Rohs P. Feld–Zeit–Ich. Entwurf einer feldtheoretischen
Transzendentalphilosophie (Time‒Field‒I am. The
project of field theory of transcendental philosophy).
Frankfurt/M., 1996. 290 p.
18. Orlov M. O. Etika diskursa kak osnova strategiy sotsializatsii
v globaliziruyushchemsya mire (Discourse
ethics as the basis of sozialisation strategies in a globalizing
world). Izv. Saratov Univ. (N.S.), Ser. Philosophy.
Psychology. Pedagogy. 2012. Vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 54–59.

Status: 
одобрено к публикации
Short Text (PDF): 

Generator XML for DOAJ

Error!
Не определено в Выпуске поле Опубликована онлайн:publicationDate