Cite this article as:

??? The Problem of Freedom as the Known Accidental in the Framework of Regularities: Synergetic Analysis. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2017, vol. 17, iss. 3, pp. 258-?. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2017-17-3-258-265


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 

The Problem of Freedom as the Known Accidental in the Framework of Regularities: Synergetic Analysis

Freedom in synergetics meaning was defined as a specific analogue of accidental, as a factor changing the ratio of evolutionary capabilities of the system. Freedom emerges only under the super- selection’s conditions that is under the control of the subject over the variety of forms of selection and ultimately over the course of social evolution. The problem of the article partly reduces to the position that causes the debates about the freedom on the issue of known accidental. There appeared a new, more sophisticated level of freedom as a known accidental which assume a new level of responsibility - responsibility for the selection. In this connection becomes actual the synergistic requirement to a subject of selection which receives the needful result only making a «definite injection in environment in the right places and at certain times» S. P. Kurdyumov, E. N. Knyazeva). The responsibility for the selection or the freedom as a known accidental implies the creation of such an organization of social production which allows in the context of social development to foresee and exclude dangerous accidents such as severe crises, wars and catastrophes. The task set us in the article has been reduced to the fact of showing that the responsibility for the choice (freedom as a recognized necessity) is reduced to the responsibility for the selection (freedom as a known accidental). The research has led us to the fact that we found the particularly value of the highest freedom and responsibility arising out of it.

Literature

1. Sinergeticheskaya fi losofi ya istorii [The Synergistic Philosophy of History]. Ed. by V. P. Branskiy, S. D. Pozharskiy. Ryazan, 2009. 314 p. (in Russian).

2. Semashko L. M. Tetrasotsiologiya: otvety na vyzovy. Perekhod pluralizma ot teorii k tekhnologii, ot rasizma k soprotivleniu, ot postmodernizma k postpluralizmu [Tetrasociology: answers the challenges. The transition of pluralism from theory to technology, from racism to resistance, from postmodernism to postplyuralizmu]. St. Petersburg, 2002. 208 p. (in Russian).

3. Prigogine I. R., Stengers I. Order out of Chaos. Man’s new Dialogue with Nature. Toronto; New York; London; Sidney, 1984. 349 p.

4. Branskiy V. P., Pozharskiy S. D. Globalizatsiya i sinergeticheskiy istorizm. Sinergeticheskaya teoriya globalizatsii [Globalization and synergistic historicism. Synergetic theory of globalization]. St. Petersburg, 2004. 400 p. (in Russian).

5. Anokhin P. K. Filosofskie aspekty funktsionalnoy sistemy: izbranye trudy [Philosophical Aspects of the Functional System Theory: selected works]. Ed. by F. V. Konstantinov, B. F. Lomov, V. B. Shvyrkov. Moscow, 1978. 399 p. (in Russian).

6. Chernova T. G. O sootnoshenii svobody i neobkhodimosti [On the Relation between Freedom and Necessity]. Vestn. Perm. un-ta. Ser. Filosoliya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya [Bulletin of the University of Perm. Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2014, iss. 2 (18), pp. 20–24 (in Russian).

7. Branskiy V. P. Iskustvo i fi losofi ya: rol fi losofi i v formirovanii i vospriyatii khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya na primere istotii zhivopisi [Art and philosophy: the role of philosophy in the creation and perception of art on the example of the history of painting]. Kaliningrad, 1999. 704 p. (in Russian).

8. Sartre J.-P. Être et le Néant. Expérience d’une ontologie phénoménologique [Being and Nothingness. Experience of a Phenomenological Ontology]. Paris, 2008. 675 p. (Russ. ed.: Sartr Zh.-P. Bytie I nichto. Opyt fenomenologicheskoy ontologii. Moscow, 2000. 639 p.).

9. Moiseev N. N. Rasstavanie s prostotoy [Parting with Simplicity]. Moscow, 1988. 480 p. (in Russian).

10. Busov S. V. Kategorialnaya struktura problemy svobody [The Categorical Structure of the Problem of Freedom]. Izv. Saratov. Univ. (N.S.), Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2015, vol, 15, iss. 4, pp. 13–18. (in Russian).

11. Marx K. Theorien über den Mehrwert (vierter Band des «Kapitals»). Marx K., Engels F. Ausgabe: in 43 Bd. Berlin, DDR, 1968. Bd. 26-III. 663 S. (Russ. ed.: Marx K. Teoriya pribavochnoy stoimosti. Marx K., Engels F. Soch.: v 50 t. 2-e izd. Moscow, 1964, vol. 26, pt. III. 674 p.).

12. Marx K. Das Kapital. Marx K., Engels F. Ausgabe: in 43 Bd. Berlin, DDR, 1962. Bd. 23. S. 11–802. (Russ. ed.: Marx K. Kapital. Marx K., Engels F. Soch.: v 50 t. 2-e izd. Moscow, 1960, vol. 23. 907 p.).

13. Knyazeva E. N., Kurdyumov S. P. Osnovaniya sinergetiki. Rezhimy s obostreniem, samoorganizatsiya, tempomiry [The grounds of synergy. The regimes with sharpening, self-organization, tempo-world]. St. Petersburg, 2002. 414 p. (in Russian).

Status: 
одобрено к публикации
Short Text (PDF): 
Full Text (PDF): 

Generator XML for DOAJ

Error!
Не определено в Выпуске поле Опубликована онлайн:publicationDate