Cite this article as:

??? Urbanism and Cosmopolitism: Social and Philosophical Point of View . Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2016, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 170-?. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2016-16-2-170-175


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 

Urbanism and Cosmopolitism: Social and Philosophical Point of View

Theoretical applicability of the idea of cosmopolitism, its connection with the most significant problems of globalization, such as migration, citizenship, local national policy, have made it an actual theme for theoretical approaches and authors striving to legitimate it as an ideological universalium in their cosmopolitical programmes. This article studies theoretical orientation and effects of transverge influence of cosmopolitization upon urbanism. The discussed problems viz. premeditated opposition and absolute power of the human’s right, indicate that cosmopolitical view is too far from providing of the whole world unanimity. Practical realization or propagation of cosmopolitization incarnates a new rhetorical approach to the idea of cosmopolitism or the private opinion of the western world and is a legal diversion that everywhere ruins the primary rights and lifestyle of the urban population, historical nature of social and political universum of States.

Literature

1. Beck U. Cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge, 2006. 311 р. (Rus. ed.: Beck U. Kosmopoliticheskoye mirovozzreniye. Moscow, 2008. 336 p.)

2. Eliade М. Histoire des croyances et des idees religieuses: in 3 vol. Vol. 2. De Gautama Bouddha au triomphe du christianisme. Paris, 1978. 512 s. (Russ. ed.: Eliade М. Istoriya very i religioznykh idey: v 3 t. T. 2. Ot Gautamy Buddhy do triumfa khristianstva. Moscow, 2002. 512 p.).

3. Nakhov I. M. Filosofi ya kinikov (Philosophy of cynics). Moscow, 1982. 224 p.

4. Collins R. Who has been a successful public intellectual? European Journal of Social Theory, November 2011, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 437‒452 (Russ. ed.: Collins R. Kto yavlyalc’a uspeshnym publichnym intellektualom? Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 11. Sotsiologiya: referativniy jurnal. 2012, no. 3, pp. 105‒110). 5. Berman H. J. Law and Revolution. The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge; Massachusetts; London, 1993. 624 р. (Russ. ed.: Berman H. J. Zapadnaya traditsiya prava: epokha formirovaniya. Moscow, 1998. 624 p.).

6. Kiefer O. Sexual life in Ancient Rome. Routledge; London, 2001. 400 p. (Russ. ed.: Kiefer O. Sexualnaya zhizn v Drevnem Rime. Moscow, 2003. 431 p.).

7. Koslowski P. Gesellschaft und Staat: ein unvermeidlicher Dualismus. Stuttgart, 1982. 368 S. (Russ. ed.: Kozlowski P. Obschestvo i gosudarstvo: neizbezhniy dualizm. Moscow, 1998. 368 p.).

Status: 
одобрено к публикации
Short Text (PDF): 
Full Text (PDF): 

Generator XML for DOAJ

Error!
Не определено в Выпуске поле Опубликована онлайн:publicationDate