globalization

In clause the socially-philosophical analysis of modern integration processes in which basis the idea of total association of people by means of new information technologies lays is spent. Computer networks, the Internet, cellular communication, acting, on the one hand, powerful means of the communications, promote virtualization of social life, substitution of real dialogue, loss of true social communications.

One of dangerous contradictions of an information epoch consists that, forming information space and providing its existence and development, the person simultaneously realizes that its biological existence is put in dependence on a level of development and speed of transformation of the information space playing an escalating role in a life of a modern society.

The question of moral and politics correlation has a deep background. All philosophers, who studied political process, made different conclusions. The correlation of moral and politics is very important problem in the world of modern social changes.

History appears as the so-state of openness of social life and as state of new formations in him. In the innovative states became topical and the form of global relations of all humanity shows up newly, transforming all accumulated them spiritual potential in a new structure and information. Article the deposit of representatives of domestic historical Idea is analyzed in the comprehension of universal connection of humanity in the states of openness and event of History.

The author analyzes the conflicts of civilizations in this article. The Author considers the reasons of these conflicts that are created value.
The value of one civilization disagrees with the value of other civilizations. At the end of article he draws a conclusion. The problem
of civilization’s conflicts has to be studied together with modern global problems and problems of modernizations. 

Статья посвящена анализу вклада представителей отечествен-
ной исторической мысли в экспликацию творческой природы
общественной жизни. История в социальном творчестве пред-
стает как состояние открытости социального бытия и как состоя-
ние новообразований (событий) в нем. В них преобразуется и по-
новому проявляется форма глобальной духовной связи всего
человечества.

This article is about the phenomenon of confession destruction in theoretical models of global culture, its synthesis and conflict. The variety of forms and fundamental character of this concept is analyzed in the context of «modernization syndrome». The essence of this phenomenon is caused by the actualization of destructive contradictions religious dominant. 

Nowadays it has become more noticeable a tendency of different states to the mutual collaborating or opposing. Interstate contacts and links reach the other qualitative level. The cause of that lies in the process of globalization, demanding from states of greater integration and search of allies. The search of efficient governance strategies treats us to approach in this article to the program of discourse management of social processes. 
 

This article is based on the phenomenon analysis of innovation and its activities. The philosophy of the innovative development is almost relevant to the intensification of innovative process and the fundamentals which is influenced by the public and private realities. The concept of Innovation is already defined and the prospects for the philosophical measurement is already set by its approach. In today’s life, we have large and wide approach for the innovative transformations which include human life, business, environment and our surroundings.

Article is devoted to a research of processes of globalization in the context of the structure and specifics of transformation of global society. Against the background of globalization there is a deformation of the existing subjects that often is represented researchers of society as something, destroying social solidarity. The special place in the context of the delivered problem is allocated to a dichotomy research «collective – individual». The author criticizes the dominating theory that because of globalization there is individualization.