Cite this article as:

Voropaev M. V., Rezakov R. G., Derevyankina O. M. Operational aspects of forming educational activity culture of future teachers in the poliparadigm educational space. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2023, vol. 23, iss. 2, pp. 226-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2023-23-2-226-230


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
UDC: 
378.147
Language: 
Russian

Operational aspects of forming educational activity culture of future teachers in the poliparadigm educational space

Introduction. The system of teacher education in Russia has been in a state of reform for several decades. There is an intensive search for technologies and approaches that could provide training for teaching staff who are able to withstand the challenges of the 21st century. Methodological understanding of the value and theoretical foundations of the design of the educational process in a pedagogical university leads to the conclusion about the plurality of pedagogical paradigms that determine the educational space and the need to take this plurality into account in the organization of the educational process. Theoretical analysis. The article attempts to identify the dominant paradigms in the space of higher education and show their meaningful characteristics. An analysis of the correlation of paradigms focused on results (competence-based and student-oriented) and on all components of the educational process (technocratic) is given. Their features and essential characteristics are highlighted. The conditions under which at the operational level it becomes possible to realize the task of forming a culture of educational activity are analyzed. Conclusion. The main conclusion of the proposed theoretical analysis is the impossibility to fully implement the task of forming a culture of educational activity in the conditions of the dominance of the technocratic paradigm. But it is quite possible to create conditions that allow this possibility.

Literature
  1. Bondarevskaya E. V. The experience of methodological refl ection of the activities of a scientifi c school. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [News of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University], 2016, no. 3 (107), pp. 4‒14 (in Russian).
  2. Shogan E. V. The Experience in organizing existential dialogues of high school students in the educational space of the school by means of modular complexes. Gumanitarnyye i sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye nauki [Humanities and Socio-Economic Sciences], 2006, no. 3 (22), pp. 172‒175 (in Russian).
  3. Kraevsky V. V., Berezhnova E. V. The paradigm of science and trends in the development of education. Pedagogy, 2007, no. 1, pp. 22‒28 (in Russian).
  4. Kolesnikova I. A. Pedagogicheskaya real’nost’ v zerkale mezhparadigmal’noy refl eksii [Pedagogical Reality in the Mirror of Inter-Paradigm Refl ection]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University Press, 1999. 242 p. (in Russian).
  5. Kornetov G. B. Pedagogicheskiye paradigmy bazovykh modeley obrazovaniya [Pedagogical Paradigms of Basic Models of Education]. Moscow, University of the Russian Academy of Education Publ., 2001. 121 p. (in Russian).
  6. Zimnyaya I. A. Key competencies – a new paradigm of the result of education. Eksperiment i innovatsii v shkole [Experiment and Innovation at School], 2009, no. 2, pp. 7‒14 (in Russian).
  7. Volodina O. V. Polyparadigmatic substantiations of modern education. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [News of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University], 2016, no. 7 (111), pp. 4–11 (in Russian).
  8. Starikova O. G. Modern Educational Strategies of Higher Education: A Polyparadigm Approach. Thesis. Diss. Dr. Sci. (Ped.). Krasnodar, 2011. 49 p. (in Russian).
  9. Lvov L. V. Designing educational systems on a polyparadigm basis: methodological aspect. Innovatsionnoye razvitiye professional’nogo obrazovaniya [Innovative Development of Vocational Education], 2014, no. 1 (05), pp. 14‒20 (in Russian).
  10. Kolesnikova I. A. Pedagogicheskaya real’nost’: opyt mezhparadigmal’noy refl eksii. Kurs lektsiy po fi losofi i pedagogiki [Pedagogical Reality: The Experience of Inter-Paradigm Refl ection. A Course of Lectures on the Philosophy of Pedagogy]. St. Petersburg, “ DETSTVOPRESS”, 2001. 288 p. (in Russian).
  11. Ezhova T. V. Pedagogical discourse as a means of humanizing the professional position of the future teacher. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya [Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education. Collection of Scientifi c Papers]. Yalta, Humanitarian and Pedagogical Academy (branch) of the “Crimean Federal University V. I. Vernadsky” Publ., 2019, iss. 63, pt. 4, pp. 68‒70 (in Russian).
  12. Makarova L. N. Educational paradigms and individual style of pedagogical activity of a university teacher. Psychological-Pedagogical Journal “Gaudeamus”, 2017, no. 2, pp. 17‒23 (in Russian).
Status: 
одобрено к публикации

Generator XML for DOAJ