Cite this article as:

Erokhin V. S. Evolutionary Development of Social Norms: from Ascriptiveness to Descriptiveness. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2020, vol. 20, iss. 3, pp. 265-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2020-20-3-265-269


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
UDC: 
1:316.61
Language: 
Russian

Evolutionary Development of Social Norms: from Ascriptiveness to Descriptiveness

The article is devoted to the analysis of such properties of normativity as ascriptivity and descriptivity, as well as the principle of the evolutionary development of norms. The article defines the content of the concept of “norm”, identifies two main interpretations of it: as a combination of a standard set of properties and as a sample of desirable behavior. It is argued that the second interpretation forms the idea of social norms. The problem investigated in the article is the presence of various properties of social norms and their corresponding requirements for people’s actions. Changing the conditions of existence of society entails a change in the relationship between ascriptive and descriptive social norms, that requires the identification of causes and possible consequences. The purpose of this work is to identify the evolutionary principle that leads to the transition from ascriptive to descriptive norms. The methodological basis of the work is the normative concept developed in the analytical philosophy of law, as well as the logic of the study of morality and religion in the philosophy of life of A. Bergson. The scientific novelty of the work consists in the approval of the evolutionary transition of ascriptive norms to descriptive ones with the preservation of a minimum number of the first ones. In addition, it is argued that the basis for such a transition is the development of technical means which ensure the independence of a man and society from the natural conditions of their existence.

Literature

1. Latinsko-russkiy slovar’. Sost. A. M. Malinin [LatinRussian Dictionary. Compiler A. M. Malinin]. Moscow, Gos. izdatel’svo inostrannykh i natsional’nykh slovarey, 1952. 764 p. (in Russian).

2. Dal' V. I. Tolkoviy slovar givogo velikorusskogo yasika: v 4 t. [Explanatory dictionary of the living great Russian language: in 4 vols.]. Moscow, Tsitadel’ Publ., 1979, vol. 2. 2030 p. (in Russian).

3. Bergson H. Les Deux Source de la morale et de la religion. Paris, Gallimard, 1932 (Russ. ed.: Bergson H. Dva istochnika morali i religii. Moscow, Kanon Publ., 2004. 384 p.).

4. Petrosyan V. K. Statics and dynamics in A. Bergson’s sociological concept. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes Journal], 2009, no. 5 (93), pp. 250–271 (in Russian).

5. Kasatkin S. N. Explanation of legal concepts in the analytical jurisprudence of G. Hart: methodology and problematization. Trudy Instityta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS], 2018, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 43–71 (in Russian).

6. Ogleznev V. V., Tarasov I. P. Ascriptivity as an ontological property of legal concepts. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 2010, no. 4 (12), pp. 101–110 (in Russian).

7. Rossiyskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Russian Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Chief ed. A. M. Prokhorov. Moscow, Bolshaya rossiyskaya entsiklopediya Publ., 2000, vol. 2. 1987 p. (in Russian).

Status: 
одобрено к публикации
Short Text (PDF): 

Generator XML for DOAJ

Error!
Не определено в Выпуске поле Опубликована онлайн:publicationDate