Cite this article as:

Беляев Е. И. Methodological Complexity of the Science of Society (Metaphilosophical Analysis). Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2011, vol. 11, iss. 2, pp. 8-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2011-11-2-8-13

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
Philosophy
Language: 
Russian

Methodological Complexity of the Science of Society (Metaphilosophical Analysis)

In article are considered problems of demarcation and the relations between history and philosophy of sociology and of their influence upon self-realization of sociology and renewing of social philosophy.

Author: 
Belyaev
Evgeniy
I.
,
Saratov State University
,
83, Astrakhanskaya str., Saratov, 410002, Russia
,
Belyaev214@mail.ru
Key words: 
philosophy of sociology, history of sociology, PARADIGM, comparative analysis of different sociological paradigms, construction of sociological theory
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2011-11-2-8-13
Literature
1. Pinnick C., Gale G. Philosophy of science and history of science//J. of General Philosophy of Science/Zeitschrift Fiur Allsemeine Wissenschaftstheorie. 2000. Vol. 1, № 31. Р. 109.  
2. Гемпель К. Логика объяснения. М., 1998. С. 16-31.
Контекст: ...Выполнено в рамках Федеральной целевой программы «Научные и научно-педагогические кадры инновационной России на 2009?2013 годы» (ГК 02. 740.11. 0592) Гемпель К. Логика объяснения. М., 1998...
 
3. Winch P. The Idea of Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. L., 1958. Р. 1-3.  
4. Структура и развитие науки. М., 1978. С. 203-235.
Контекст: ...Р. 1?3. Структура и развитие науки. М., 1978...
 
5. Kuhn T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, 1962. P. Х.  
6. Dogan M. Paradigms in the Social Sciences//International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2001. Vol. 16. Р. 11023-11027.  
7. The Interpretative Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture/eds. D. R. Hiley, J. F. Bohman, R. Shusterman. Ithaka, 1991;  
8. Kuhn T. S. The Road Since Structure//Philosophical Essays (1970-1993) with Autobiographical Interview/eds. J. Conant, J. Haugeland. Chicago, 2000.  
9. Ritzer G., Goodman D. Sociological Theory. Boston, cop. 2004. XXIV.     
10. Rashevsky N. Outline of a Unified Approach to Physics, Biology and Sociology//Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. 1969. Vol. 31. Р. 159-198.  
11. Bajoit G. Le renouveau de la sociologie contemporaine//Sociologies. 2008. 27 avril. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://sociologies.revues.org/index 873.html (дата обращения: 12.01.2010).  
12. Ferrara A. The Idea of a Social Philosophy//Constellations. 2002. Vol. 9, № 3. P. 8.
Status: 
одобрено к публикации
Short Text (PDF): 
2.pdf
Full Text (PDF): 
2.pdf

Generator XML for DOAJ

Error!
Не определено в Выпуске поле Опубликована онлайн:publicationDate