Cite this article as:

Pavlova N. V. Negative Social Communications. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2013, vol. 13, iss. 2, pp. 51-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2013-13-2-51-55

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
Philosophy
UDC: 
116;1241
Language: 
Russian

Negative Social Communications

The article discusses the process of social communication in terms of its negative effect on human existence. The author conceptualizes the idea of negative social communication in the context of postmodernism and claims that an increased number of social interactions in postmodern society can be harmful for the nature of communication. The author believes that postmodern society should be considered as a system of social flows, unlike the previous paradigm (i.e. modernity). To explore the complex phenomenon of negative social communication the author analyzes social flows functioning as the social objects of negative communication, their mechanisms and effects. It is shown that among the factors which contribute to the process of negative communication in postmodern reality, the social objects of communication seem to be the most significant; so these objects of negative influence are divided into categories and analyzed in details. The author concludes with reference to the damaging impact of negative social communication on a person who is involved in this process.

Author: 
Pavlova
Natalia
V.
,
Saratov State University
,
83, Astrakhanskaya str., Saratov, 410002, Russia
,
natali_61@list.ru
pavlova_saratov@mail.ru
Key words: 
communication, society, social flows, negative social communication
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2013-13-2-51-55
Literature
  1. Wittgenstein L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. L., N.Y., 1963, 166 p. (Russ. ed.: Vitgenshtein L. Logiko-fi losofskiy traktat. Moscow, 2009. 133 p.).
  2. Wittgenstein L. Filosofskiye raboty: V 2 ch. (Philosophical Works: In 2 vol.). Moscow, 1994.Vol. 1. 612 p.
  3. Buber M. I and Thou. L., 2004, 112 p. (Russ. ed.: Buber M. Ya i ty. Kvintessentsiya: Filosofskiy almanakh {The quintessence: The Philosophical Miscellany}, 1992, pp. 294–370).
  4. Emmanuel Levinas: Put k drugomu (Emmanuel Lévinas: The Path to the Other). St.-Petersburg, 2007. 240 p.
  5. Bibler V. Kultura. Dialog kultur (Culture. The Dialogue of Cultures). Voprosy fi losofi i (Issues of philosophy), 1989, no. 6, pp. 31–42.
  6. Lasswell G.D., Smith B. L., Casey R. D. Propaganda, Communication and Public Order. Princeton, 1946.
  7. Parsons T. Sistema koordinat deystviya i obshchaya teoriya sistem deystviya. Funktsionalnaya teoriya izmeneniya. Ponyatiye obshchestva (The action frame of reference and the general theory of action systems: culture, personality and the place of social systems. Social change. The concept of society). Amerikanskaya sotsiologicheskaya mysl (American sociological thought), Moscow, 1996. Pp. 462–525.
  8. Luhmann N. What is Communication? Communication Theory. 1992, vol. 2, iss. 3, pp. 251–259. (Russ. ed.: Luman N. Chto takoe kommunikatsiya? Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal {The Journal of Sociology}, 1995, no. 3, pp.114–125).
  9. Lévi-Strauss C. Structural Anthropology. L., 1968, 410 p. (Russ. ed.: Levi-Stros K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. Moscow, 1985. 399 p.).
  10. Baudrillard J. Simulacra and Simulation. Ann Arbor, 1994. 164 р.
  11. Deleuze G. The Logic of Sense. L., 1990, 393 p. (Russ. ed.: Delez Zh. Logika smysla. Moscow, 1998. 480 p.). 
Status: 
одобрено к публикации
Short Text (PDF): 
filosofiya_2021_2_51-55.pdf
Full Text (PDF): 
filosofiya_2021_2_51-55.pdf

Generator XML for DOAJ