Cite this article as:

Perevozny A. V. Responsibility as a quality of personality: Essence, formation, significance. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2021, vol. 21, iss. 1, pp. 101-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2021-21-1-101-105


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
UDC: 
37.017.7
Language: 
Russian

Responsibility as a quality of personality: Essence, formation, significance

The article discusses the significance of responsibility in providing safety of the environment surrounding the person. The problem is caused by the contradiction between the human need for security and impossibility in many cases to satisfy it because of inadequate fulfilment of the duties by employees. The purpose of the article is to outline the ways of solving this contradiction by pedagogical means. The methodological basis of the research is systematic, activity-based, and subject-subject approaches. The author reveals the essential features of responsible behavior and prerequisites for the formation of a responsible person: macro-level (organization of public life); family and other micro-communities; educational institutions. Importance of effort consolidation of all subjects of pedagogical influence for solving urgent educational problems is noted. The role of certain principles of education in the formation of a responsible person in the past and at the present stage is shown. Particular attention is paid to the role of higher education in the formation of responsibility, since it is in the university environment where students develop such patterns of behavior that afterwards may be used in public and everyday life, and in their profession. This approach makes a purely pedagogical issue socially important.

Literature
  1. Efremova T. V. Sovremennyy tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka: v 3 t. T. 2 [Contemporary Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language: in 3 vols.]. Moscow, AST Publ., Astrel Publ., 2006, vol. 2. 1160 p. (in Russian).
  2. Kondrashov V. A., Chekalov D. A., Koporulina V. N. Noveyshiy fi losofskiy slovar [The Newest Philosophical Dictionary. A. P. Jaroshenko, total ed.]. Rostov on Don, Feniks Publ., 2008. 668 p. (in Russian).
  3. Kodzhaspirova G. M., Kodzhaspirov A. Yu. Slovar po pedagogike [The Dictionary on Pedagogics]. Moscow, ITs “MarT”; Rostov on Don, Izdatel’skii tsentr “MarT”, 2005. 448 p. (in Russian).
  4. Rubinshteyn S. L. Osnovy obshchey psihologii: v 2 t. T. 2 [The Principles of General Psychology: in 2 vols.]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1989, vol. 2. 328 p. (in Russian).
  5. Emelyanov G. I. Media activities in conditions of emergencies of different nature. Tavricheskij nauchnyj obozrevatel [Taurida Science Observer], 2017, no. 12, pt. 2, pp. 41–46 (in Russian).
Status: 
одобрено к публикации
Short Text (PDF): 

Generator XML for DOAJ

Error!
Не определено в Выпуске поле Опубликована онлайн:publicationDate