Cite this article as:

Darensky V. Y. The Dialogic Structure of Artistic Reflection. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2014, vol. 14, iss. 1, pp. 14-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2014-14-1-14-18

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).

Heading:

Philosophy

UDC:

7.01 + 130.2

Language:

Russian

The Dialogic Structure of Artistic Reflection

This article is devoted to analysis of dialogic dimensions of art as an essential phenomenon in artistic experience of contemporary man. The concept of «dialogue» is analyzed to be the fundamental principle of the relation of a person with art. The concept of «artistic reflection» is considered as a key to problem of the dialogic interpretation of artistic work. Phenomenon of artistic dialogue is interpreting here as a unity of individual and common in artistic experience. The author also promises the conception of essential levels of this dialogue as a factor of personal development. The author promises the conception of basic levels of «artistic language», which are defined as a image, symbol and artistic mythos. In article new understanding of essential specific of universal artistic forms of human experience and worldview is offered. The fundamental specifics of artistic conception of human being is defined as a growing of sense in artistic «image of world». Thus, only artistic conception of human being enables to consider every single event of life as the unique which is inwardly integral and has its own special sense in worldview context.

Author:

Darensky

Vitaly

Far Eastern Federal University

Russia, 690090, Vladivostok, ul. Sukhanov, 8

darenskiy1972@mail.ru

Key words:

dialogue, STRUCTURE, artistic, understanding, reflection, experience

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2014-14-1-14-18

Literature

Stepin V. S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. Struktura, istiricheskaya evolucia (Theoretical knowledge. Structure and historical evolution). Moscow, 2000. 672 p.
Malakhov V. A. Uyazvimost l’ubvi (Vulnerablity of love). Kiev, 2005. 560 p.
Schul’ga R. I. Bytovanie iskusstva v sfere obydennogo soznanija (Being of art in a sphere of everyday consciousness). Iscusstvo: khudozhestvennaya realnost i utopiya (Art: artistic reality and utopia). Kiev, 1992, pp. 78–104.
Kruglikov V. A. Obraz «cheloveka kultury» (The image of «man of culture»). Moscow, 1988. 152 p.
Gadamer G.-G. Aktualität des Schönen. Kunst heute. Hrsg. A. Paus. Graz, 1975. 386 s. (Russ. ed.: Gadamer G.-G. Aktualnost prekrasnogo. Moscow, 1991. 367 p.).
Volkova E. V. Proizvedenie iskusstva v mire khudozhestvennoy kultury (Artistic work in the world of artistic culture). Moscow, 1988. 234 p.
Ricoeur P. Germenevtika. Etika. Politika. Moskovskie lektsii (Hermeneutic. Ethic. Politics. Moscow lectures). Moscow, 1995, pp. 19–37.

Journal issue:

Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2014, vol. 14, iss. 1,

Status:

одобрено к публикации

Short Text (PDF):

filosofiya_2014_1_14-18.pdf

Full Text (PDF):

filosofiya_2014_1_14-18.pdf

Generator XML for DOAJ

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records>
 <record>
  <language>eng</language>
  <publisher>Saratov State University</publisher>
  <journalTitle>Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy</journalTitle>
  <issn>1819-7671</issn>
  <eissn>2542-1948</eissn>
  <publicationDate>2014-03-12</publicationDate> 
  <volume>14</volume>
  <issue>1</issue>
  <startPage>14</startPage>
  <endPage>18</endPage>
  <doi>10.18500/1819-7671-2014-14-1-14-18</doi>
  <documentType>article</documentType>
  <title language="eng">The Dialogic Structure of Artistic Reflection</title>
  <authors>
    <author>
      <name>Darensky, Vitaly Y.</name>
      <affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
    </author>
  </authors>
  <affiliationsList>
    <affiliationName affiliationId="1">Far Eastern Federal University, Russia, 690090, Vladivostok, ul. Sukhanov, 8</affiliationName>
    </affiliationsList>
  <abstract language="eng">This article is devoted to analysis of dialogic dimensions of art as an essential phenomenon in artistic experience of contemporary man. The concept of «dialogue» is analyzed to be the fundamental principle of the relation of a person with art. The concept of «artistic reflection» is considered as a key to problem of the dialogic interpretation of artistic work. Phenomenon of artistic dialogue is interpreting here as a unity of individual and common in artistic experience. The author also promises the conception of essential levels of this dialogue as a factor of personal development. The author promises the conception of basic levels of «artistic language», which are defined as a image, symbol and artistic mythos. In article new understanding of essential specific of universal artistic forms of human experience and worldview is offered. The fundamental specifics of artistic conception of human being is defined as a growing of sense in artistic «image of world». Thus, only artistic conception of human being enables to consider every single event of life as the unique which is inwardly integral and has its own special sense in worldview context.
</abstract>
  <fullTextUrl format="pdf">https://old-phpp.sgu.ru/sites/old-phpp.sgu.ru/files/2022/03/filosofiya_2014_1_14-18.pdf</fullTextUrl>
  <keywords language="eng">
    <keyword>dialogue</keyword>
    <keyword>STRUCTURE</keyword>
    <keyword>artistic</keyword>
    <keyword>understanding</keyword>
    <keyword>reflection</keyword>
    <keyword>experience</keyword>
  </keywords>
 </record>
</records>