Cite this article as:

Frolova S. V. The Model of Individual Commitment Factors to Social Community. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2013, vol. 13, iss. 4, pp. 80-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2013-13-4-80-86

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
Psychology
UDC: 
159.9:316.6
Language: 
Russian

The Model of Individual Commitment Factors to Social Community

In this article the author's original system model of factors of individual commitment to a social community of a country has been introduced. The author suggests that the key factor of the given model is the social-psychological space of an individual represented by a person’s image sphere and meaningful sense forming feelings. The author also introduces the concept of the level of social integration as one of the important parameters of individual commitment to the social community and describes the image-association test and mathematical toolkit of its measurement. The data of the empirical check of the hypothesis regarding interconnection of individual commitment and the social community with the level of social integration of an image sphere have been given in this work.

Author: 
Frolova
Svetlana
Vladimirovna
,
Saratov State University
,
83, Astrakhanskaya str., Saratov, 410002, Russia
,
frolovasv71@mail.ru
Key words: 
commitment to a social community, the social-psychological space of an individual, level of social integration of an image sphere, meaningful feelings, emigration intentions
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2013-13-4-80-86
Literature
  1. Becker H. S. Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journ. of Sociology. 1960, vol. 66, no.1, pp. 32–40.
  2. Rebzuev B. G. Chetyrekhsloinaya model affektivnoy predannosti: opyt primeneniya na rossiiskoy vyborke (The four-layer model of affective commitment: experience of application on the Russian sample). Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal (Psychological journal), 2006, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 44–59.
  3. Grachev A. A. Psikhologicheskoe proektirovanie proizvodstvennoy organizatsii (Psychological projection of the industrial organization). St. Petersburg, 2008. 189 p.
  4. Allen N. J., Meyer J. P. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journ. of Occupational Psychology, 1990, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1–18.
  5. Becker T. E., Randall D. M., Riegel C. D. The multidimensional view of commitment and the theory of reasoned acton: A comparative evaluation. Journ. of Management, 1995, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 617–638.
  6. Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar (The philosophical encyclopaedic dictionary). Moscow, 1989. 815 p.
  7. Bondyreva S. K. Migratciya (sushchnost i yavlenie) (Migration [essence and the phenomenon]). Moscow; Voronezh, 2004. 296 p.
  8. Boneva B., Friese I. H. Achievement, Power and Affiliation Motives as Clues to (E)migration Desires: A Four-Countries Comparison. European Psychologist, 1998, vol. 3, no 4, pp. 247–255.
  9. Lifton R. J. Understanding the traumatized self. Human adaptation to extreme stress. N.Y.; L., 1988, pp. 7–31.
  10. Frolova S. V. Predstavleniya sovremennoy molodezhi ob emigratcii kak uspeshnoy zhiznennoy i karernoy strategii (Representations of modern youth about emigration as successful vital and сareer strategy). Izv. Saratov. university. Nov. ser. Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogics. 2012. vol. 12, iss. 4, pp. 97–100.
  11. Lomov B. F. Sistemnost v psikhologii: isbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy (Systemness in psychology: the Elected psychological works). Moscow; Voronezh, 2003. 424 p.
  12. Kursak V. A. Perekhodnoye obshchestvo: naslediye, traditsii, opyt (Transitive society: a heritage, traditions, experience). Moscow, 1999.
  13. Buchanan P. J. State of emergency. The third world invasion and conquest of America Edge of destruction. N.Y., 2006. 320 p. (Russ. ed.: Buchanan P. J. Na krayu gibeli (At edge of destruction). Moscow, 2008. 349 p. 
  14. Toffl er A. Future shock. N.Y., 1970. 362 p. (Russ. ed.: Toffl er A. Shok budushchego. Moscow, 2002. 557 p.).
  15. Frolova S. V. Smysloobrazuiushchie factory emigratcionnykh namereniy studentov (Sense-forming factors of emigratory intentions of students ). Psikhologicheskii zhurnal (Psychological journal), 2006, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 58–67.
  16. Zhuravlev A. L., Kupreichenko A. B. Sotcialno-psikhologicheskoe prostranstvo litnosti (Social-psychological space of person). Moscow, 2012. 496 p.
  17. Gostev A. A. Psikhologiya vtorichnogo obraza (Psychology of secondary image). Moscow, 2007. 512 p.
  18. Bassin F. V. «Znachashchie» perezhivaniya i problema sobstvenno-psikhologicheskoy zakonomernosti («Meaning» experiences and a problem of own - psychological lawness). Voprosy psikhologii (Problems of psychology), 1972, no. 3, pp. 105–124.
  19. Tishkov V. A. Etnichnost, natsionalizm i gosudarstvo v postkommunisticheskom obshchestve (Ethnicness, nationalism and the state in a postcommunistic society). Voprosy sotsiologii (Questions of sociology), 1993, no 1, pp. 4.
Status: 
одобрено к публикации
Short Text (PDF): 
filosofiya_4_2013_80-86.pdf
Full Text (PDF): 
filosofiya_4_2013_80-86.pdf

Generator XML for DOAJ