Cite this article as:

Frolova S. V., Troyanova A. V. Typological analysis of a personality’s sociocultural orientation among the representatives of various age groups. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 4, pp. 441-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2022-22-4-441-448


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
UDC: 
316.6
Language: 
Russian

Typological analysis of a personality’s sociocultural orientation among the representatives of various age groups

The introduction focuses on the role of sociocultural determination, mechanisms of cultural transmission and social inheritance in the development of human psyche and personality. The theoretical part considers psychological types of a personality’s sociocultural orientation that were theoretically deduced through the analysis of a subject’s attitude to traditions and innovations, in-group and out-group culture. The author describes ten types of a personality’s sociocultural orientation: harmoniously balanced, locally oriented, locally-traditional, locally innovative, alternatively oriented, alternatively traditional, alternatively innovative, globally-traditional, globally-innovative, globally-indifferent ones. The empirical part provides the results of the comparative research into the types of a personality’s sociocultural orientation among representatives of three age groups: 1) age range of 46–54 years, 2) age range of 27–36 years, 3) age range of 17–19 years. The author ascertains dominating types of a personality’s sociocultural orientation for each group under study. Harmoniously balanced and globally-innovative types of a personality’s sociocultural orientation prevail among the representatives of the older generation; globally-innovative and alternatively oriented (to the values of out-group culture) types are more common for the age range of 27–36 years. Globally-indifferent type of a personality’s sociocultural orientation is of greatest research interest in the youngest age group. The conclusion looks at the key trends, factors, risks and resources of a personality’s sociocultural development among various age groups.

Literature
  1. Vygotskiy L. S., Luriya A. R. Etyudy po istorii povedeniya: Obezyana. Primitiv. Rebenok [Etudes on the History of Behavior: Monkey. Primitive. Child]. Moscow, Pedagogika-Press Publ., 1993. 224 p. (in Russian).
  2. Leontyev A. N. Memory development. Experimental study of higher psychological functions. In: A. A. Leontyev, D. A. Leontyev, E. E. Sokolova, eds. Stanovlenie psikhologii deyatelnosti: rannie raboty [The Emergence of the Psychology of Activity: Early Work]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2003, pp. 27–198 (in Russian).
  3. Luriya A. R. Ob istoricheskom razvitii poznavatelnykh protsessov [On the Historical Development of Cognitive Processes]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1974. 172 p. (in Russian).
  4. Zhane P. Psikhologicheskaya evolyutsiya lichnosti [Psychological Evolution of Personality]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 2010. 399 p. (in Russian).
  5. Berri Dzh. V., Purtinga A. Kh., Sigall M. Kh., Dasen P. R. Kross-kulturnaya psikhologiya. Issledovaniya i primenenie [Cross-Cultural Psychology. Research and Application. Transl. from English]. Kharkov, Gumanitarnyy tsentr Publ., 2007. 560 p. (in Russian).
  6. Kursak V. A. Perekhodnoe obshchestvo: nasledie, traditsii, opyt [Transitive Society: A Heritage, Traditions, Experience]. Moscow, Rossiyskiy Yuridicheskiy Izdatelskiy Dom, 1999. 95 p. (in Russian).
  7. Frolova S. V. Socio-Psychological Concept of the Personality’s Commitment to the Country. Diss. Dr. Sci. (Psychol.). Saratov, 2020. 504 p. (in Russian).
  8. Sorokin P. A. Amnesia and new columbus. Rubezh. Almanakh sotsialnykh issledovaniy [Frontier. Almanac of Social Research], 1992, no. 4, pp. 48–61 (in Russian).
  9. Buchanan P. J. State of emergency. The third world invasion and conquest of America Edge of destruction. New York, 2006. 320 p. (Russ. ed.: B’yukenen P. Dzh. Na krayu gibeli. Moscow, AST Publ., 2008. 349 p.).
  10. Emelyanova T. P. Social representations and symbolic coping in the context of cultural trauma. In: A. L. Zhuravlev, A. V. Yurevich, eds. Makropsikhologiya sovremennogo rossiyskogo obshchestva [Macropsychology of Modern Russian Society]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2009, pp. 85–136 (in Russian).
  11. Shtompka P. Social change as a trauma. In: Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Research], 2001, no. 1, pp. 6–16 (in Russian).
  12. Shils E. Tradition and liberty: Antinomy and interdependence. Ethics, 1958, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 153–165.
  13. Zenkovskiy V. V. Psikhologiya detstva [Psychology of Childhood]. Ekaterinburg, Delovaya kniga Publ., 1995. 348 p. (in Russian).
  14. Shpet G. G. Psikhologija sotsial’nogo bytiya [Martsinkovskaya T. D., ed. Psycho logy of Social Being]. Moscow, Institut prakticheskoy psikhologii, Voronezh, NPO “MODEK”, 1996. 492 p. (in Russian).
  15. Maslou A. Psikhologiya bytija [Toward a Psychology of Being]. Moscow, Refl -buk Publ., Kiev, Vakler Publ., 1997. 300 p. (in Russian, trans. from English).
  16. Gostev A. A. Psikhologiya vtorichnogo obraza [Psychology of Secondary Image]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2007. 512 p. (in Russian).
Status: 
одобрено к публикации

Generator XML for DOAJ