Cite this article as:

Penner R. V. From the subject to the agent in social and humanitarian discourses of the 21st century. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 4, pp. 393-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2022-22-4-393-397

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
Philosophy
UDC: 
111.5
Language: 
Russian

From the subject to the agent in social and humanitarian discourses of the 21st century

Introduction. The article is focused on the problem of tuning research optics in the directions of vision and understanding a subject, society and the whole world. Since the Age of Enlightenment, the idea of subjectivity has been the foundation for such optics. In the 21st century the place of the subject is claimed by multiple agents that do not have a human nature. Theoretical analysis. In addition to nature as such and the organisms inhabiting it, the role of agents today is being played by instruments and technologies, including digital technologies. In order to trace the development of the idea of agency in social and humanitarian discourses, the article is based on the concepts of modern authors who carry out their research within the framework of the so-called queer theory (posthuman by R. Braidotti, companion species by D. Haraway and A. Tsing, agential realism and intraactivity by K. Barad). Conclusion. In posthumanistic logic, the contemporary world can be perceived as a smooth, heterogeneous space (G. Deleuze). In this “smoothness” it becomes more and more difficult to single out one or another element that is capable of performing the function of a structuring beginning, hierarchizing the external. The article concludes that the understanding of a person, society, nature and technology through the agential prism will clarify research optics in the context of social and humanitarian discourses.

Author: 
Penner
Regina
Vladimirovna
,
South Ural State University (National Research University)
,
76 Lenin prospekt, Chelyabinsk 454080, Russia
,
pennerrv@susu.ru
Key words: 
agents, subjectivity, society, nature, technology, digital technologies, digital anthropology
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2022-22-4-393-397
Literature
  1. Haraway D. Tentacular thinking. In: M. Kramar, K. Sarkisov, eds. Opyty nechelovecheskogo gostepriimstva. Antologiya [Experiences of Inhuman Hospitality. An Anthology]. Moscow, V-A-C press, 2018, pp. 180–228 (in Russian).
  2. Zhang Y. The age and accretion of the Earth. EarthScience Reviews, 2002, no. 59, iss. 1–4, pp. 235–263.
  3. Roberts N. The Holocene: An Environmental History. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 2014. 376 p.
  4. Elias S. A. Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2013. 3576 p.
  5. Moore J. W. Capitalism and the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. London, Verso, 2015. 336 p.
  6. Tsing A. Unruly Edges. In: M. Kramar, K. Sarkisov, eds. Opyty nechelovecheskogo gostepriimstva. Antologiya [Experiences of Inhuman Hospitality. An Anthology]. Moscow, V-A-C press, 2018, pp. 228–251 (in Russian).
  7. Deleuze J., Guattari F. Tysyacha plato: Kapitalizm i shizofreniya [A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia]. Yekaterinburg, U-Factoria Publ., Moscow, Astrel Publ., 2010. 895 p. (in Russian).
  8. Haraway D. Manifest kiborgov: nauka, tekhnologiya i sotsialisticheskiy feminizm 1980-kh [The Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s]. Moscow, AdMarginem, 2017. 128 p. (in Russian).
  9. Braidotti R. Postchelovek [Posthuman]. Moscow, Gaidar Institute Publishing House, 2021. 408 p. (in Russian).
  10. Braidotti R. A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities. In: M. Kramar, K. Sarkisov, eds. Opyty nechelovecheskogo gostepriimstva. Antologiya [Experiences of Inhuman Hospitality. An Anthology]. Moscow, V-A-C press, 2018, pp. 24–41 (in Russian).
  11. Latour B. Visualization and cognition: depicting things together. Logos, 2017, vol. 27, no. 2 (117), pp. 95–156 (in Russian).
  12. Barad K. Agential realism. In: M. Kramar, K. Sarkisov, eds. Opyty nechelovecheskogo gostepriimstva. Antologiya [Experiences of Inhuman Hospitality. An Anthology]. Moscow, V-A-C press, 2018, pp. 42–121 (in Russian).
  13. Tikhonova S. V., Artamonov D. S. Weird time in object-oriented ontology: Harman and Latour. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofi ja. Sociologija. Politologija [Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science], 2021, no. 63, pp. 43–52 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223-199886XXX-63-5
Status: 
одобрено к публикации
Full Text (PDF): 
filosofiya_2022_4-393-397.pdf

Generator XML for DOAJ