Cite this article as:

Alebastrova A. A. Idea of «The Other» in riskogenic society. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2013, vol. 13, iss. 3, pp. 3-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2013-13-3-3-6


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
UDC: 
1:316
Language: 
Russian

Idea of «The Other» in riskogenic society

The article is devoted to consideration of a problem of «The Other» in refraction of a social and philosophical view of a place and a role of the person in the conditions of development of the techno-genic civilization creating conditions of transformation of human society in «risk society». The author, noting inevitability of consideration of «The Other», addresses to the analysis of modern philosophical concepts. Opening a problem of preservation of human identity in the conditions of increase of aggressive expansion of equipment, the author comes to a conclusion that only creation of model of «The Other», allowing to look at itself eyes of «The Other», is the only opportunity to keep in itself the person in the conditions of construction of the world of a postmodern for mankind.The article is devoted to consideration of a problem of «The Other» in refraction of a social and philosophical view of a place and a role of the person in the conditions of development of the techno-genic civilization creating conditions of transformation of human society in «risk society». The author, noting inevitability of consideration of «The Other», addresses to the analysis of modern philosophical concepts. Opening a problem of preservation of human identity in the conditions of increase of aggressive expansion of equipment, the author comes to a conclusion that only creation of model of «The Other», allowing to look at itself eyes of «The Other», is the only opportunity to keep in itself the person in the conditions of construction of the world of a postmodern for mankind.

Literature
  1. Stepin V. C. Nauchnoye poznaniye i tsennosti tekhnogennoy tsivilizatsii (Scientific knowledge and values of technogenic civilization). Voprosy filosofii (Issues of philosophy), 1989, no. 10, pp. 3–18.
  2. Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva (Esthetics of verbal creativity). Moscow, 1979. 445 p.
  3. Konev V. A. Priroda sotsialnogo (Nature of the social). Nichto i poryadok. Samarskiye seminary po frantsuzskoy filosofii (Nothing and order. The Samara seminars on the French philosophy). Samara, 2004, pp. 28–33.
  4. Ustyantsev V. B. Zhiznennoye prostranstvo, chelovek, riski (Vital space, person, risks). Saratov, 2012. 208 p.
  5. Lenk H. Philosophie im technologischen Zeitalter. Stuttgart, 1970. 174 p. (Russ. ed.: Lenk H. Razmyshleniya o sovremennoy tekhnike. Moscow, 1996. 183 p.)
  6. Camus A. L’Homme révolté (The Rebel). Paris, 1951. 384 p. (Russ. ed.: Kamyu A. Buntuyushchiy chelovek. Moscow, 1990. 415 p.).
Status: 
одобрено к публикации
Short Text (PDF): 
Full Text (PDF): 

Generator XML for DOAJ