Cite this article as:

Aksenovskaya L. N. Spiritual psychology of S. L. Frank in the context of modern tasks of the development of Russian social psychology. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 4, pp. 413-422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2022-22-4-413-422


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
UDC: 
316.6
Language: 
Russian

Spiritual psychology of S. L. Frank in the context of modern tasks of the development of Russian social psychology

The introduction highlights the points of contact between the ideas of S.L. Frank’s spiritual psychology and the theme of “generational survival”, developed within the framework of metamodernism and metapsychology, and the relevance of spiritual psychology for solving the problems facing modern Russian social psychology. The theoretical analysis is devoted to understanding the essence of the phenomenon of spirituality, the connection of the spiritual and socio-psychological in the works of S. L. Frank, the development of S. L. Frank’s ideas in the order approach to the socio-psychological study of culture, the essence of metamodern psychology and its socio-psychological aspects. The correspondence of the ideas of metamodernism and metapsychology to the ideas of spiritual psychology of S. L. Frank is considered. It is shown that the basis for independent development at the present stage are the realities of Russian social reality and the experience of predecessors (in particular, S. L. Frank), the restoration of the intellectual tradition of studying the spiritual experience of the “survival” of generations and overcoming difficulties as a theoretical and methodological basis. In conclusion conclusions are drawn about the relevance of Frank spiritual psychology for solving the problems of the development of Russian social psychology in the context of a metamodern worldview; that modern Russian social psychology faces the need to determine its own development paths without relying on Western social psychology. The analysis of the spiritual aspects of social phenomena and the experience of “survival”, the oscillation method brings metamodern psychology and methodology closer to Frank’s spiritual psychology, despite semantic discrepancies.

Literature
  1. R. Van den Akker, T. Vermeulen, A. Gibbons, eds. Metamodernism. Historicity, Affect, and Depth After Postmodernism. Published: September 16, 2017 by Rowman & Littlefi eld International. 245 p. (Russ. ed.: Van den Akker R. Metamodernizm. Istorichnost, Affekt i Glubina posle postmodernizma. Moscow, RIPOLKlassik Publ., 2022. 496 p.).
  2. Grebenyuk A. A. Fundamentals of Metamodern psychology. Metamodernizm: zhurnal o metamodernizme (Metamodernism: A Magazine about Metamodernism). Available at: https://metamodernizm.ru/metamodernizm-psychology/ (accessed 10 September 2022) (in Russian).
  3. Frank S. L. Krushenie kumirov [The Collapse of Idols]. In: Frank S. L. Sochineniya [Essays]. Moscow, Pravda Publ., 1990, pp. 111–180 (in Russian).
  4. Ryken L., Wilhoit J. C., Longman T. III, eds. Dictionary of Biblical Imagery. Downers Grove, Illinois, USA, Inter Varsity Press, 1998. 1058 p. (Russ. ed.: Slovar bibleyskikh obrazov. Pod obshch. red. L. Raikena, Dzh. Uilkhoita, T. Longmana III. St. Petersburg, Bibliya dlya vsekh Publ., 2005. 1424 p.).
  5. James W. Diversity of religious experience. Longmans, Green, And Co, New York, London, Bombay, Calcutta and Madras, 1917. 621 p. (Russ. ed.: Dzhems V. Mnogoobrazie religioznogo opyta (reprintnoe izdanie. Moscow, 1910). St. Petersburg, Andreev i synovia Publ., 1993. 418 p.).
  6. Simonov P. V., Ershov P. M., Vyazemskiy U. P. Proiskhozhdenie dukhovnosti [The Origin of Spirituality]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1989. 352 p. (in Russian).
  7. Il’ichev L. F., Fedoseev P. N., Kovalev S. M., Pa- nov V. G., ans. eds. Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar [Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow, Sovetskaya entsiklopediya Publ., 1983. 840 p. (in Russian).
  8. Samuels A., Shorter B., Plaut F. A Critical Dictionary of Jungian Analysis. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London and New York, 170 p. (Russ. ed.: Semyuelz E., Shorter B., Plot F. Kriticheskiy slovar analiticheskoy psykhologii K. Unga. Moscow, MNPP “ESI” Publ., 1994. 184 p.).
  9. Foucault M. L’herméneutique du sujet: Cours au Collège de France (1981–1982). Gallimard, 2001. 540 p. (Russ. ed.: Fuko M. Germenevtika subekta. In: Sotsio-logos. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1991, pp. 284–311).
  10. Petrovskii A. V., Yaroshevskii M. G., eds. Psikhologiya. Slovar [Psychology. Dictionary]. Moscow, Politizdat, 1990. 494 p. (in Russian).
  11. Shpet G. G. Sochineniya [Essays]. Moscow, Pravda Publ., 1989. 601 p. (in Russian).
  12. Frank S. L. Dusha cheloveka: opyt vvedeniya v fi losof skuyu psikhologiyu [The Human Soul: The Experience of Introduction to Philosophical Psychology]. Moscow, Knizhnyi klub Knigovek Publ., St. Petersburg, Severo-Zapad Publ., 2015. 384 p. (in Russian).
  13. Frank S. L. Nepostizhimoe [The Unfathomable]. In: Frank S. L. Sochineniya [Essays]. Moscow, Pravda Publ., 1990, pp. 183–556 (in Russian).
  14. Senokosov U. P. Semen Lyudvigovich Frank. In: S. L. Frank. Sochineniya [Essays]. Moscow, Pravda Publ., 1990, pp. 3–6 (in Russian).
  15. Aksenovskaya L. N. Ordernaya kontseptsiya organizatsionnoy kultury: voprosy metodologii [The Order Concept of Organizational Culture: Issues of Methodology]. Saratov, Izdatel’stvo Saratovskogo universiteta, 2005. 348 p. (in Russian).
  16. Guseltseva M. S. Metamodernism in Psychology: New methodological strategies and Changes in Subjectivity. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psichologiya, 2018, vol. 8, iss. 4, pp. 327–340 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.402
Status: 
одобрено к публикации

Generator XML for DOAJ