Cite this article as:
Stepanova N. A. The Problem of Studying Self-Determination of Personality in the Domestic Psychological Science. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2019, vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. 69-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2019-19-1-69-75
The Problem of Studying Self-Determination of Personality in the Domestic Psychological Science
The article presents the analysis of the current domestic research of the problem of self-determination of personality. It is shown that the peculiarities of the domestic concept of self-determination is the synthesis of foreign experience and our own developments in the field of motivation, self-regulation and subjectivity. In domestic studies it is shown that adolescence is sensitive in the development of self-determination, but there are not enough studies of its ontogenetic features, revealing basic conditions, mechanisms and prerequisites of development. A new approach to the study of self-determination on the basis of its spiritual foundations is proposed. It is shown that spirituality can act as a basic component of self-determination of personality, allowing a person to regulate his life, based on the highest spiritual values. In this connection, as a perspective direction of further research in the field of selfdetermination the study of the dynamics of its ontogenetic development on the basis of spiritual fullness is highlighted.
1. Kuz’mina E. I. Psikhologiya svobody: teoriya i praktika: uchebnoe posobie [Freedom Psychology: Theory and Practice: Study Guide]. Ed. E. I. Kuz’mina. St. Petersburg, 2007. 336 p. (in Russian).
2. Leont’ev V. G. Problemy psikhologii motivatsii v otechestvennoi psikhologii [Motivation Psychology Problems in Domestic Psychology]. In: Psikhologiya motivatsii: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., posvyashchennoi 85-letiyu doktora psikhol. nauk, pochetnogo professora NGPU V. G. Leont’eva [Psychology of Motivation: Past, Present, Future: materials of the International Scientifi c- Practical Conference Dedicated to the 85th Anniversary of Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Honorary Professor of NSPU V. G. Leontiev]. Eds. O. A. Belobrykina, N. Ya. Bol’shunova. Novosibirsk, 2015, pp. 50‒57 (in Russian).
3. Sheldon K. M. Introduction to the Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and New Approaches to the Growth of Motivation. Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Siberian Journal of Psychology], 2016, no. 62, pp. 7–17 (in Russian).
4. Bolotova A. K., Puretsky M. M. Concepts of Self- Regulation: A Historical Retrospective. Кul’turnoistoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 2015, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 64‒74 (in Russian).
5. Leont’ev D. A. Autoregulation, Resources, and Personality Potential. Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Siberian Journal of Psychology], 2016, no. 62, pp. 18–37 (in Russian).
6. Kimberg A. N. Subject, Subjectivity and Related Phenomena. Personality and Being: Subjective Approach (to the 80th Anniversary of the Birth of A. V. Brushlinsky). Materials of the VI All-Russian Scientifi c Conference. Eds. Z. I. Ryabikina, V. V. Znakov. Moscow, Krasnodar, 2013, pp. 17‒22 (in Russian).
7. Razmyshleniya i predstavleniya o fenomene sub”ektnosti v razlichnykh obrazovatel’nykh prostranstvakh [Refl ections and Ideas about the Phenomenon of Subjectivity in Various Educational Spaces]. Eds. F. G. Mukhametzyanova et al. Kazan, 2016. 252 p. (in Russian).
8. Nartova-Bochaver S. K. The Psychological Sovereignty as a Predictor of Emotional Resilience in Youth and Early Adulthood. Klinicheskaia i spetsial’naia psikhologiia (Clinical Psychology and Special Education), 2015, vol. 4, no. 1. Available at: http://psyjournals.ru/psyclin/2015/n1/Nartova-Bochaver.shtml (accessed 20 June 2018) (in Russian).
9. Gordeeva T. O. Teoriya samodeterminatsii: nastoyashchee i budushchee. Chast’ 1: Problemy razvitiya teorii (The Self-Determination Theory: Present and Future. Part 1: Problems of Theory Development). Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya: elektron. nauch. zhurn. (Psychological Researches: Electronic Scientifi c Journal), 2010, no. 4 (12). Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2010n4-12/343-gordeeva12 (accessed 18 June 2018) (in Russian).
10. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Self-determination theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York, 2017. 754 p.
11. Leont’ev D. A., Kaliteevskaya E. R., Osin E. N. Personal Potential During the Transition from Childhood to Adulthood and the Formation of the Self. In: Lichnostnyi potentsial: struktura i diagnostika [Personal Potential: Structure and Diagnostics]. Ed. by D. A. Leont’ev. Moscow, 2011, pp. 611–641 (in Russian).
12. Belous E. I. Psikhologiya dukhovnosti [Psychology of Spirituality]. Vladivostok, 2014. 474 p. (in Russian).
13. Matveeva A. I. Problema dukha, dushi i dukhovnosti v kontekste prirody cheloveka [The Problem of Spirit, Soul and Spirituality in the Context of Human Nature]. Kazan, 2016. 180 p. (in Russian).
14. Romanenko N. G. To a Problem of Spirituality in Organization. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2017, vol. 17, iss. 1, pp. 85–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2017-17-1-85-88 (in Russian).
15. Grubbs J. B., Wilt J., Stauner N., Exline J., Pargament K. Self, Struggle, and Soul: Linking Personality, Self- Concept, and Religious/Spiritual Struggle. Personality and Individual Differences, 2016, Vol. 101, pp. 144‒152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00229-4
16. Jackson Y., Makanui K. P., Gusler S. Spirituality and Its Relation to Mental Health Outcomes: An Examination of Youth in Foster Care. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2018, vol. 10, iss. 2, pp. 67‒76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000184
17. Willard A. K., Norenzayan A. “Spiritual but not religious”: Cognition, Schizotypy, and Conversion in Alternative Beliefs. Cognition. 2017, vol. 165, pp. 137‒146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.018
18. Stepanova N. A. Model of Development of Selfdetermination as the Basis of Prevention of Addictive Behavior of Adolescents in Contemporary Educational Organizations. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological-Educational Studies], 2017, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 21‒32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2017090403
19. Ivanova V. P., Yusupova A. Zh. Self-Determination and Intellectual Competence. Vestnik KRSU [Bulletin of KRSU], 2016, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 94‒97 (in Russian).
20. Sulimina O. V. The Problem of Formation of Personal and Social Controls in the Period of Transition from Childhood to Adulthood. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie PSYEDU.ru [Psychological Science and Education PSYEDU.ru], 2014, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 91–101 (in Russian).
21. Fel’dshtein D. I. Psikhologiya vzrosleniya. Strukturnosoderzhatel’nye kharakteristiki protsessa razvitiya lichnosti: izbrannye trudy [Psychology of Growing up. Structural Characteristics of the Process of Personality Development: Selected Works]. By total ed. D. I. Fel’dshtein. Moscow, 2004. 670 p. (in Russian).
22. Hardy S. A., Dollahite D. C., Christensen J. B. Adolescent Motivations to Engage in Prosocial Behaviors and Abstain from Health-Risk Behaviors: A Self-Determination Theory Approach. Journal of Personality, 2015, vol. 83, pp. 479‒490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12123
23. Taylor G., Jungert T., Magelau G., Schattke K., Dedic H., Rossenfi eld S., Koestner R. A Self-determination Theory Approach to Predicting School Achievement Over Time: The Unique Role of Intrinsic Motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2014, vol. 39, iss. 4, pp. 342‒358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.002
Generator XML for DOAJ
Не определено в Выпуске поле Опубликована онлайн:publicationDate