Cite this article as:

Solomko D. V. The role of technical in the preservation and reproduction of the living principle in a human. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2023, vol. 23, iss. 2, pp. 164-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2023-23-2-164-168

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
Philosophy
UDC: 
13(02.15.51)
Language: 
Russian

The role of technical in the preservation and reproduction of the living principle in a human

Introduction. The tendency to strengthen the priority of the technical side of life and the activity of a modern person, characterized by increasing complexity and ambiguity in the definition of a human and his world, aggravates the problem of preserving and reproduction of a living principle in a human. A problematic question arises: is a person – a living person – possible in a technical and technologized world in general? Theoretical analysis. The article notes that when solving the indicated problem, the rejection of the technique, the process of technicalization, technical in general are not provided. However, the absolutization of the meaning of the technical in the life and activity of a human is not supposed, when the existence of a person is reduced to the technical. A modern person needs a kind of reorientation – not to be included in the world of technology and techniques, but, on the contrary, to include them in his life in order to remain modernly alive. All the diversity of life at the expense of new techniques is ensured. Conclusion. In relations between the human and the technical, it is proposed to be based on the principles of the eco-humanistic approach (integrity, coordination, consistency and optimality), when favorable development opportunities, the realization of the internal potential of each side are provided.

Author: 
Solomko
Dmitry
Vitalievich
,
South Ural State University (National Research University)
,
76 Lenin prospekt, Chelyabinsk 454080, Russia
,
dimiurg85@mail.ru
Key words: 
technique, technical, living principle in a human, INTEGRITY, оptimality, irreducibility
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2023-23-2-164-168
Literature
  1. Budanov V. G. Conceptual model of socio-anthropological projections of converging NBICS-technologies. In: Socio-antropologicheskie resursy transdisciplinarnyh issledovanij v kontekste innovacionnoj tsivilizatsii [Socio-Anthropological resources of transdisciplinary research in the context of innovative civilization: a collection of scientifi c articles]. Kursk, Universitetskaja kniga Publ., 2015, pp. 24–34 (in Russian).
  2. Baryshnikov P. N. A typology of immortality in the theoretical fi eld of French transhumanism. Filosofskie problemy informacionnyh tehnologij i kiberprostranstva [Philosophical Problems of Information Technology and Cyberspace], 2014, no. 1, pp. 98–127 (in Russian).
  3. Bolonkin A. A. Bessmertie ljudej i jelektronnaja civilizacija (Immortality of people and electronic civilization). Available at: http://lit.lib.ru/b/bolonkin_a_a/immortalityofpeopleandelectroniccivilization.shtml (accessed 7 March 2023) (in Russian).
  4. Bostrom N. FAQ po transgumanizmu (FAQ on transhumanism). 2002. Available at: https://coollib.com/b/326779/read (accessed 7 March 2023) (in Russian).
  5. Jepshtejn M. N. Proektivnyj slovar’ gumanitarnyh nauk [Projective Dictionary of the Humanities]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2017. 616 p. (in Russian).
  6. Doherty P., Wilson J. Chelovek + mashina. Novyye printsipy raboty v epokhu iskusstvennogo intellekta [Human + Machine. New Principles of Work in the Era of Artifi cial Intelligence]. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov and Ferber Publ., 2019. 304 p. (in Russian).
  7. Skinner K. Chelovek tsifrovoy. Chetvertaya revolyutsiya istorii chelovechestva, kotoraya zatronet kazhdogo [Digital Human. The Fourth Revolution in Human History that Will Affect Everyone]. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov and Ferber Publ., 2019. 304 p. (in Russian).
  8. Haraway D. Manifest kiborgov: nauka, tekhnologiya i sotsialisticheskiy feminizm 1980-kh [The Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism of the 1980s]. Moscow, AdMarginem Publ., 2017. 128 p. (in Russian).
  9. Kutyrjov V. A. Uneseonnye progressom: jeskhatologiya zhizni v tekhnogennom mire [Gone with the Progress: Eschatology of Life in the Technogenic World]. St. Petersburg, Alethea Publ., 2016. 300 p. (in Russian).
  10. Kutyrjov V. A. Chelovechestvo i tehnos: fi losofi ja kojevoljucii [Humanity and Technos: The Philosophy of Co-evolution]. St. Petersburg, Alethea Publ., 2020. 261 p. (in Russian).
  11. Heidegger M. Otreshennost’ (Detachment). 1991. Available at: http://lib.ru/HEIDEGGER/gelassen.txt (accessed 7 March 2023) (in Russian).
  12. Solomko D. V. The basic principles of the eco-humanistic approach. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the University of Omsk], 2021, vol. 26, no. 33, pp. 68–75 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24147/1812-3996.2021.26(3).68-75
  13. Smirnov S. A. Anthropological boundaries of humanitarian expertise. Filosofskaja antropologiya [Philosophical Anthropology], 2019, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 26–44 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.21146/2414-3715-2019-5-1-26-44
  14. Yudin B. G. From ethical expertise to humanitarian expertise. Znaniye. Ponimaniye. Umeniye [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill], 2005, no. 2, pp. 126–135 (in Russian).
  15. Gubin V. D., Nekrasova E. N. Filosofskaya antropologiya [Philosophical anthropology]. Moscow, Forum Publ., 2008. 250 p. (in Russian).
Status: 
одобрено к публикации
Full Text (PDF): 
filosofiya_2023_2-164-168.pdf

Generator XML for DOAJ