семья

Androcentrism continues to be the basis for modern thinking, and the comprehension of its manifestations in the philosophical tradition appears to be a necessary step to change this situation. The purpose of this work is to analyze the theory of K. Marx for its androcentrism, to identify its significant provisions based on it. The analysis is built around testing how the “general” statements of Marx reflect women’s experience, how they are woven into the whole of the theory and how much they are substantiated by it.

The author’s approach to the problem of the structure of subjectivity of the family as a group is presented. For the first time, the subjectivity of the family is revealed as a dynamic socio-psychological property, in the structure of which the following are distinguished: the possibility, readiness and ability of the family to be a subject. The possibility of being a subject is expressed in the family potential, which creates the prospect for the family to acquire the status of a group subject.

The article discusses the significance of responsibility in providing safety of the environment surrounding the person. The problem is caused by the contradiction between the human need for security and impossibility in many cases to satisfy it because of inadequate fulfilment of the duties by employees. The purpose of the article is to outline the ways of solving this contradiction by pedagogical means. The methodological basis of the research is systematic, activity-based, and subject-subject approaches.

Статья  посвящена  образно-смысловым  особенностям  тол-
кования  семейных  отношений  в  раю.  В  ней  рассматривается 
райский брак в контексте учения восточных христианских бо-
гословов.  Отмечается,  что  до  грехопадения  в  брачном  союзе 
присутствуют  два  основных  образа  семьи:  как  малой  церкви 
и как тварной троицы. Помимо  этого подробно раскрывается 
цель  установления  брака.  По  мысли  богословов  Восточной 
Церкви,  она  заключается  в  уподоблении  человека  Богу,  чему 

In article problems of a family and family education to which addressed
in the works as outstanding teachers – K. D. Ushinskiy, P. F. Lesgaft,
P. F. Kapterev, and public figures – N. V. Shelgunov, L. N. Tolstoy,
N. I. Pirogov are considered. Family upbringing is of great importance
in historical development of society as a family, being the first and
most significant conductor of social influence for the child, enters it
into all variety of the related relations, a family life, causing these or

В статье проанализированы теоретические подходы к понима-
нию  процесса  формирования  представления  о  родительстве. 
Выборка  исследования  включала  в  себя  60  респондентов. 
Применение  комплекса  методик  –  «Диагностика  межличност-
ных отношений» Т. Лири (адаптирована Л. H. Собчик, в моди-
фикации Р. В. Овчаровой), PARI E. C. Шеффера и P. K. Белла 
(адаптирована Т. В. Нещерет, в модификации Т. В. Архиреевой), 
«Представления об идеальном родителе» Р. Г. Овчарова, а так-