Cite this article as:

Losev A. V. Moral Nature of Philosophy. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2020, vol. 20, iss. 2, pp. 138-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2020-20-2-138-142


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Heading: 
UDC: 
101.1
Language: 
Russian

Moral Nature of Philosophy

The article explores the moral nature of philosophy. The source of philosophy is the duality of human existence. Philosophy is moral in its essence, being a way of life which actualizes the contradictory unity of the dual human nature in thoughts and deeds. Historically, there were three types of understanding the philosophy: the Sophia type, the epistemic type and the technematic type. The Sophia type, first formulated by Pythagoras, comes from the idea of love of wisdom. Being the fullness of knowledge, wisdom is accessible only to God. Man’s lot is the eternal search for wisdom. Historically the Sophia understanding of philosophy was the first interpretation of philosophy which was also the most correct one in meaning. The epistemic approach understands philosophy as a science. Epistemology rejects the Sophia understanding of philosophy as a morally oriented search for wisdom. The technematic understanding of philosophy goes back to the sophists. Wisdom was understood by the sophists as an art of proving and refuting anything. The art of thinking in itself is not a philosophy as it can be aimed at both good and evil. Philosophy, being the love of wisdom, should not serve evil. The idea of the moral essence of philosophy is of particular importance to the Russian tradition of love of wisdom which is related to the Sophia logos. The rejection of the epistemic and technematic interpretations of philosophy separates the Russian thought both from the triumph of scientific philosophy and from the ridicule of the playful mind.

Literature

1. Mayorov G. G. Filosofi ya kak iskanie Absolyuta: opyty teoreticheskie i istoricheskie [Philosophy as a Search for the Absolute: Theoretical and Historical Experience. 3rd ed.]. Moscow, Knizhnyy dom “LIBROKOM” Publ., 2012. 416 p. (in Russian).
2. Guseynov A. A. Ethics and its role in philosophy. In: Moral v sovremennom mire i problemy rossiyskoy etiki [Morality in the Modern World]. Ed. by B. I. Pruzhinin. Moscow, St. Petersburg, CGI Print Publ., 2017. 223 p. (in Russian).
3. Bakhtin M. M. Izbrannoe: v 2 t.. Tom I: Avtor i geroy v esteticheskom sobytii [Selected works: in 2 vols. Vol. I: The Author and the Character in an Aesthetic Event]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2017. 544 p. (in Russian).
4. Fetisov V. P. Solntse ne zakhodit. Trudy po nravstvennoy fi losofi i [The Sun does not Set. Works on Moral Philosophy]. Voronezh, Voronezhskaya gosudarstvennaya lesotekhnicheskaya akademiya, 2011. 518 p. (in Russian).
5. Platonov A. P. Chevengur [Chevengur]. Moscow, Vremya Publ., 2011. 608 p. (in Russian).

Status: 
одобрено к публикации
Short Text (PDF): 

Generator XML for DOAJ

Error!
Не определено в Выпуске поле Опубликована онлайн:publicationDate